GeekGirlDiva Lectures Rich Moore

Previously, I reported on the situation with the Wreck It Ralph sequel, and Lucasfilm’s reluctance to allow a comedic lampooning of their villain, Kylo Ren.

To recap:

“At one point we had a joke about Kylo Ren being kind of a spoiled child,” laughs Moore. “We went to Lucasfilm and said, here’s what we’re doing. And they said, well, we’d prefer that you don’t show him as a spoiled child. You know, he is our villain, and we’d prefer you don’t do that. So we were respectful of that.”

It’s just part of the process, the filmmakers explain, but also the whole point of including beloved and familiar Disney characters in Ralph Breaks the Internet is to “honor who these characters are” and be appropriate to their history while taking “playful jabs.” Like C-3PO being the butler to the princesses, for example. That “felt like that’s of his character,” says Johnston. “It’s really loving satire that we’re doing.”

“Mostly at our own expense, with our jobs!” smiles Moore.

Ralph

Ralph would wreck Kylo for Lucasfilm.

Well, starwars.com writer GeekGirlDiva has some stern words for Rich Moore:

Catching up on this brouhaha about Disney not “allowing” Ralph Breaks The Internet to make a joke about Kylo Ren. Here’s my read on this.

1) Rich Moore asked. Lucasfilm said they’d prefer they didn’t. No one issued a C & D or did anything nasty. No one got sued. pic.twitter.com/79WW7RVHwx

— Geek Ghoul Diva 👻 (@geekgirldiva) October 22, 2018

1) Rich didn’t say that Lucasfilm got nasty with a cease and desist order, nor did he claim that anyone was sued.

2) RBTI is for kids who see Kylo as a villain. Satirizing Kylo there is different than SNL.
3) Lucasfilm has the right to protect their IP. They made the decision. Not Disney.
4) The headlines make you click.

p.s. I prefer IGN’s headline. https://t.co/gEY8Juu0g1

— Geek Ghoul Diva (@geekgirldiva) October 22, 2018

2) Then why are other Lucasfilm villains satirized in material intended for kids who see those characters as villains?

EmpireStrikesOut.JPG

3) How is frowning upon a satire of Kylo Ren protecting the IP?

4) That’s the entire point of headlines.

 

5 thoughts on “GeekGirlDiva Lectures Rich Moore

    • Well right. Like I mentioned in the previous post about Wreck It Ralph, Daniel Jose Older depicted Kylo as a spoiled child in his Last Shot novel. This was a silly move on Lucasfilm’s part, but then, this is today’s Lucasfilm, so….

      Like

  1. It reminds me of the excuse they gave to not air Star Wars Detours (which from the clips that pre-Disney Lucasfilm released, I found to be pretty funny). They said something along the lines that kids shouldn’t be introduced to Star Wars characters as comical caricatures (as if kids were too dumb to know the difference). Months later they release a Star Wars parody from some kids TV show that Disney owns and airs on their channels. Worse, they continue to produce comical parodies ever since. Bunch of hypocrites…

    Liked by 2 people

  2. “2) Then why are other Lucasfilm villains satirized in material intended for kids who see those characters as villains?”

    Because they were created by Lucas, and Lucas is a white heterosexual man.

    Emo Ren’s creation was approved by the LGBTWDIQEU-HIV12334432??()/WTF feminazi collective currently ruling over Lucasfilms.

    Then again, Emo Ren is already quite the joke as he already is.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s