“There was only two(?) Underage girls in that chat” with Bryan Young

As a result of my first and second blog posts on the matter, some more apples have fallen from of the tree.  Some public responses from those involved in the chat was made in regards to my second blog post on the matter:

http://archive.is/3ekl4

So on the one hand Téa states that the participants in this chat were “not teenagers” but rather were all “19-24 year old women.”  But after j-mee responds to that by citing “underage girls” three times, and makes specific reference to “minors” who should “quit actively seeking out content they cannot consent to.”  Téa then admits that, “There was only two(?) Underage girls in that chat.”  Téa dismisses j-mee’s admonishment by stating that, “Also they did consent to it.”  But what Téa may not understand, is that in most jurisdictions minors are legally unable to give consent in situations such as this.

So which is it?  Where the participants in the chat 19-24 year old women, or were they underage girls in the chat?  I posed that question to Téa.

Urban Dictionary has some definitions of “stan twitter” for those who may not know what it is.

http://archive.is/NWb05

http://archive.is/EJT6O

http://archive.is/SXukJ

http://archive.is/98Oj0

http://archive.is/sUIwu

So this leaves us with some questions.  How can Téa be certain of the ages of anyone within the chat?  Minors are notorious for lying about their age in order to gain access to adult venues.  Long ago, minors lied about their age to get into the military.  Minors have lied about their age to get into R rated movies.  Minors have lied about their age to buy alcohol from liquor stores.  They’ve lied about their age to gain access to nightclubs and concerts.  So it’s possible that some of the members lied about their age, even if they were all online friends who have never met in real life who share personal info.  Twitter has no age verification system that I’m aware of.

If there were “only two” minors in the chat, then how would Téa know if they were in bed or were lurking?  How do we know that they were inactive at all?  Why would they “give consent” if they were inactive and in bed?  The question mark that Téa places right next to “only two” seems to suggest that while she knows that minors were present in the chat, she doesn’t have any real idea at all as to how many minors were in the chat.  So were more than two in the chat?  More who were active?  If Téa wasn’t forthright about the two “underage girls” when she initially claimed everyone was “19-24,” then how can we be sure that she’s being forthright about the two “underage girls” being inactive during the chat?

Shortly after the time of this sex chat around June 21st however, j-mee makes a pretty strong distinction between “young women” and “teens” in the following tweet:

It makes me sick that an older, adult man would come into such a lovely community to prey on young women and teens. I hope this never happens again, but if it does, please reach out to us older fans, so we can help take proper steps to contact authorities, etc. Be safe y’all.❤️

— j-mee (@strawberryxtalk) June 21, 2018

http://archive.is/hSQrB

It would seem that even if j-mee weren’t in the chat, she may be familiar with the details of it.  Why would there be a need to reach out to older fans or contact authorities if everyone involved was 19-24 years old?  Why would “teens” to reach out to older fans if they were inactive and in bed?

Participants in this chat are tight-lipped about “the br*an y*ung incident,” even if it might place the members of their community in danger, thanks to politics.

some jackass antifeminist Disney-Ruined-Star-Wars loser is up in one of my threads from June talking about the br*an y*ung incident, demanding screenshots, and I’m absolutely fucking floored by how entitled some of these assholes can be

— earl grey jedi (@bodhicha) November 12, 2018

these assholes are literally fishing for ammunition to try and tear down anyone they label a leftist and while I have a LOT of issues with how that situation went down, I’m not adding fuel to the whole antifeminist/antileftist fire

— earl grey jedi (@bodhicha) November 12, 2018

like, yeah, I blocked a solid dozen notable rlos over this, but I am not going to help out these losers on their fucking crusade of evil

— earl grey jedi (@bodhicha) November 12, 2018

http://archive.is/qootR

So much like the James Gunn incident, even if something inappropriate did take place online, the participants are reluctant divulge the information because they prioritize their politics over protecting themselves.  That alone should be a strong indication of just how sick that particular brand of politics truly is.

Regardless, this would seem to be a dangerous situation for Lucasfilm to be in, if one of its representatives is actively engaging in sex chats that may or may not have minors present and active in it.  How long before this sort of activity extends into the real world, if it hasn’t already, particularly in light of the accusations being brought against Bobby Roberts, Bryan Young’s co-host for the Full of Sith podcast?

http://archive.is/0Xkys

Is that the angle that “these types” always go for?  Or is it the angle that oftentimes ends up being the case?

http://archive.is/KWvFI

Male Feminist

This blog post has been archived here.

Twitter

Twitter terms of service.

4 thoughts on ““There was only two(?) Underage girls in that chat” with Bryan Young

  1. Pingback: Ethan Van Sciver Releases Star Wars Sex Abuse Video | Disney Star Wars is Dumb

  2. Pingback: Ethan Van Sciver Releases Part 2 Of Star Wars Sex Abuse Video | Disney Star Wars is Dumb

  3. Pingback: Bryan Young Is Also a Filmmaker | Disney Star Wars is Dumb

  4. Pingback: Rachel Butera Quietly Replaced In Star Wars Resistance? | Disney Star Wars is Dumb

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s