Liberal Wanted The Last Jedi To Be More Liberal

Ian Harris writes a piece in The Michigan Daily entitled, ‘The Last Jedi’ and the state of film criticism.

But what I take even more of an issue with than the film itself is the discussion surrounding it.

I find myself in the same place, but for different reasons.

The originals are generally loved and the prequels generally loathed, with “The Force Awakens” and “Rogue One” both falling somewhere in the pretty-good-or-maybe-great-but-not-amazing range.

I’d have to disagree.  Rather, it seems to be the Sequel Trilogy that is now generally loathed, with the Prequel Trilogy having mixed opinions.

Before it was released in theaters worldwide, “The Last Jedi” boasted a stellar 94 percent on the critical aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes. That number has since gone down to a still impressive 90 percent. But for whatever reason, audiences didn’t take to the film in the same way. The audience score on the same website currently sits at a middling 49 percent, the worst ever for a “Star Wars” picture. 

That reason is politics.  As the recent Oscars demonstrated, those working within the industry are ruled by the political fashions of the day.  It affects absolutely everything they do.  Critics are no different; they have based their reviews of the film on the political lectures they received which they found agreeable, to the exclusion of genuine film craft considerations.

But rather than a productive debate about the merits of the movie’s themes, commentary on its characters or possibly what it was actually trying to say and whether or not it succeeded in it, much of the discussion that surrounds “The Last Jedi” resembles that of a political debate or a Twitter feud between celebrities.

That’s because the Star Wars franchise has now become the latest skirmish in the much larger cold culture civil war.

One of the prominent narratives that surrounds this film is that the people who don’t like “The Last Jedi” don’t like it for one of the following reasons: All of its main characters are either women or people of color, it doesn’t respect white males and makes all the male characters stupid and they can’t let go of the old “Star Wars” they remember from when they are kids.

That of course is entirely incorrect.  No such narrative exists, prominent or otherwise.  Rather, that is a purely imaginary point that SJWs have wholly fabricated in order to have something to argue against, in an effort to defend the political messaging in the film.

Think about this logically for a moment.

What sense would it make for long time fans to be upset over the inclusion of female or non-white characters, when both female and non-white characters have been in Star Wars throughout its entire 40 year history, going back to the very beginning.

What sense would it make for any fans to be upset over the inclusion of female or non-white characters so suddenly with The Last Jedi, when its predecessor The Force Awakens was generally well received?  Why would they suddenly become enraged over such things now?

Of course it doesn’t make any sense, which is why SJWs believe it to be true.  None of what Harris is contending here has any basis in factual reality.  I understand that SJWs believe that it’s still 1968, and really want it to be.  But in reality it’s actually 2018.  These battles were fought and won 40 years ago or more.

Now let me preface this by saying that by no means are these the only criticisms being leveled at the film’s detractors, but they are the ones making the loudest splash and the ones that are most dangerous for allowing us to have a meaningful discussion about the film itself.

No.  What’s actually making the loudest splash are the SJWs arguing against these non-existent points, much in the same way that they virtue signaled one another over the equally imaginary black stormtrooper controversy.

That’s one of the more fascinating aspects of SJW psychopathology.  SJWs are compelled to argue against points that no one is making.

One article that was making the rounds over this past weekend was titled “Why So Many Men Hate ‘The Last Jedi’ But Can’t Agree on Why.”

Yes, I’ve commented on that silly article.

The author’s argument essentially boils down to this: “Because there is no central criticism of this film that everyone agrees upon, the reason people don’t like it must be sexism.”  She points to the prequel films as examples of films everyone agrees are bad for the same specific reasons and uses that to explain that if “The Last Jedi” were actually a bad movie, everyone would have the same criticisms of it.

To which I explain:

Not necessarily.  This assumes that there’s a heated disagreement as to why The Last Jedi is bad.  Rather, what this merely shows is that there’s multiple reasons why The Last Jedi is bad.  Moreover, movie viewers are allowed to have differing opinions as to why they might not like a film, just as they are allowed to have differing opinions as to why they might like a film.  This really isn’t evidence of anything more than the existence of differing opinions.  Differing opinions are what happens when people aren’t forced to comply with the consensus of the collective.

“If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn’t thinking.” ~George Patton

Ian continues:

Art is, by its very nature, subjective.

Actually, that is entirely incorrect.  The notion that art is entirely subjective is a myth that is pushed primarily by those with no education or training in the arts.  Art has objective standards that one can be trained in and judged by.  Therefore, art cannot be entirely subjective.  It’s that simple.

Taste is subjective, art is not.

It’s perfectly reasonable to like bad movies.  Many people do; the fans and producers of MST3K for instance.  But it’s important to recognize that a movie is bad, even when it’s liked.  One of the worst movies ever made, Highlander II: The Quickening, is one of my favorites.  It’s such a clusterfarkle of bad ideas that I find it wholly entertaining to watch.  But I’m able to recognize that it’s not a good film despite the pleasure it brings me.  I don’t allow my personal taste to affect my objectivity.

I think that it is important that we as liberals not (to quote “Revenge of the Sith”) become the very thing we want to destroy. If we attack anyone who criticizes a movie that features a woman in the starring role simply because the movie features a woman in the starring role, we do ourselves a disservice. 

Yet that’s what you do anyway.  Read the sentences you wrote above about the purely imaginary points that you’re arguing against.  You cannot help yourselves.

Do I think there are probably some crazy people out there who hate “The Last Jedi” because it’s about a female Jedi, a Black stormtrooper and a Resistance led by women and people of color? Yes, of course, there are those people. But those people probably also hated the similarly diverse “The Force Awakens” and “Rogue One” and neither of those movies created the kind of division that “The Last Jedi” did.

And yet, genuine posts that openly state such things can’t be found.  We can’t be certain that the few that have been pointed to aren’t posted by SJW activists perpetrating a hate hoax in order to prove a point that doesn’t exist, as was the case with the De-Feminized Fan Edit.

My issues with “The Last Jedi” involve basically every single part of the film, but what I do not have any issue with is the casting or the nature of the characters. Far from it, I believe these characters and these actors have been severely underserved by the story they were given. 

I agree, and have said so multiple times on this blog.

She is a gifted actress who had a great character in the first movie that I believe was wasted in “The Last Jedi.”

Her character really wasn’t any better in The Force Awakens, once the nostalgia goggles are removed.

Rey basically sits on the sidelines for the entire third act of the film, in which Luke Skywalker and Kylo Ren take center stage. Her entire storyline revolves around needing a man to bring back to the fight (first Luke, then Kylo).

Yes, but she then gets to lecture that man about what he’s done and why he did it, as though she were there or has any wisdom of her own, then prances off as Yoda informs the audience that she already knows everything in the Jedi books.  But remember, she’s not a Mary Sue.

I don’t believe that “The Last Jedi” is bad because it stars a woman.

Nobody does.  But it probably makes you feel bold to type that sentence out anyway.

I believe that it is bad because it doesn’t feature its main character (who happens to be a woman) nearly enough. It makes Rey into an agent of Luke and Kylo’s storylines, rather than using them as supporting players in hers.  

All Luke did was milk some alien nipples and project a Force Doppelganger.  Are you sure that you understand the distinction between main and supporting characters?  Do you know what an ensemble is?

“The Last Jedi” wants to be seen as the most progressive and forward-thinking “Star Wars” yet, but in the last act of the film, it gives up on all of that to fall back on everything it claims it wants to forget. The film purports to be about realizing your heroes were flawed and not looking for an old man to come and face down an entire evil army, and then at the end of the movie Luke Skywalker comes out of hiding to face down an entire evil army. 

In the lamest fashion possible.

Seemingly the entire point of Benicio Del Toro’s character was to show that this isn’t a conflict with straight lines of good and evil, but one filled with shades of grey. And yet at the end of the movie, we are left with good guys vs. bad guys, one side that blows up planets and one side that saves lives. Rey and Kylo Ren are supposedly conflicted characters grappling with the darkness and light inside of them, but at the end of the movie Rey is unquestionably good and Kylo is unquestionably evil. There is no moral ambiguity about the ending of “The Last Jedi.”

That’s the result of stupidly insisting on a fan-ficish “remnants of the Empire” scenario.  Good vs. evil is the only possible outcome in that setting.

Even the movie’s attempts to critique the Han Solo archetype Poe Dameron fell flat on its face. While he is chastised early on for having a dumb plan that gets a few people killed, he later initiates an even dumber plan that leads to all but 10 members of the Resistance getting killed and nobody seems to care.

Not even the women in charge who lead all but a dozen or so Resistance fighters to their deaths.

Regardless, we should be able to have a conversation about a movie about space wizards who can make rocks move and fly through space without becoming mortal enemies in the process. 

Ahh.  The commonly parroted “space wizards” remark.  The remark that demonstrates that SJWs should never have been allowed anywhere near this franchise.  Before the Sequel Trilogy was released, Lucasfilm advertised TFA as “The Cinematic Event of a generation.”  Now that the franchise sucks thanks to ridiculous things like Kal-Leia, it’s just a movie about “space wizards with laser swords.”  Go read some Joseph Campbell for Pete’s sake, will ya?

Seriously though, a reasonable conversation with people who make and perpetuate false accusations in an effort to protect political messaging is highly unlikely.

But then again, I hated the movie, and from what I understand that must mean I just didn’t get it.

Or that you’re racist, sexist, and/or misogynist.

I understand that Harris is trying to articulate his dislike of the film from his liberal point of view.  But pay close attention to the nature of his complaints.  For Harris, the film wasn’t liberal enough.  If Harris had his way, the film would be far far worse.  So much so that he might have even named the main character Rey Bechdella.

hqdefault

Some fashion glasses would help make The Last Jedi more liberal.

Thanks to SC Reviews for finding this article.

Yoda To Shower Rey With Love And Kisses In Episode IX

WARNING: RUMOR

A purported “insider” tells New York Daily News, that Yoda’ will return in Episode IX in service of this dying franchise.

“Star Wars” producers are planning to bring back Yoda, according to a source familiar with Episode Nine of the storied franchise.

“The success of the scenes featuring Yoda in ‘The Last Jedi’ were huge,” says our insider. If all goes according to plan, the sci-fi space sage will rejoin the series in spirit to mentor a young warrior played by British actress Daisy Ridley, we’re told.

The insider does not define success.

“Yoda will again appear as a ghost as he acknowledges Rey’s success and growth as a Jedi,” we hear. “The scenes are due to be put together later this year.”

No doubt Yoda will gush with unconditional praise for Rey’s ability to use the Force to learn about the Force and train in the Force.  It’s just the sort of thing that a fan-fic propagandist would contrive.

Yoda

If his body hadn’t vanished, they’d be flogging his dead corpse.

In related news, Daisy Ridley doesn’t think that Rey has any weaknesses, and that the character is not a Mary Sue.

What Did People Learn From The Last Jedi Blu-Ray?

Germain Lussier at i09 writes a piece entitled, All the New Things We Learned From the Star Wars: The Last Jedi Blu-Ray.  In it, he describes some tidbits for those who are unwilling to buy the Blu-Ray themselves:

Before he even wrote the movie, writer-director Rian Johnson had these very specific ideas in his head: The idea of a casino planet where the one percent of the Star Wars universe lives.

SJW politics at its silliest.  Trump is a one percenter you see, because Trump owns casinos.  The truth is, one percenters tend to stay close to seats of government, where they can make deals and get kick backs and kiss the behinds of those in power.

It took the make-up team almost six months just to design Kylo Ren’s scar.

Six months to design a scar.  That explains a lot.

The hand that pulls the dice down from the Millennium Falcon mirror belongs to Rian Johnson. It’s his cameo.

A nice metaphor for how he’s taken down the franchise.

Creature designer Neal Scanlan said that The Last Jedi has more special effects work in it than The Force Awakens and Rogue One combined. Much of it ended up on the cutting room floor, but you can see some of it on the home release.

And far less screenwriting work than The Holiday Special.

In editing, Johnson almost cut out the lingering shot of the baby porgs in the Millennium Falcon many times. But every time she saw it, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy laughed, so it stayed in.

Rian takes good direction from Kathleen Kennedy.  Clearly.

There was a lot of discussion of what Captain Phasma’s exposed eye would look like when Finn breaks her helmet. Johnson credits Daisy Ridley for telling him to just make it normal.

Daisy Ridley is so brilliant.  You wouldn’t want the eye to be damaged or scarred from the shrapnel of the helmet or anything.

While writing, Johnson considered having Luke use the Force for some massive attack at the end, but felt it went against his idea that the Force is not a superpower.

So instead he had Leia fly through space like Superman, with a superpower.

Despite many attempts to make them practical, from animatronics to dressing up dogs, Crait’s crystal foxes are all digital. Digitally, though, each one has 25,000 strands of CG hair coming off it.

Which means that Lucafilm was falsly touting the “practical” effects of the crystal foxes when they released this The Evolution of the Crystal Fox:

So apparently they’re making practical effects solely for marketing purposes now.

Johnson recorded his director’s commentary before the movie was released, so he never addresses some of the more “controversial issues.” However, even then he already had an idea they would be polarizing.

Not to worry.  There’s plenty on record from Rian Johnson’s Explanation Tour.

Rob Hunter writing at filmschoolrejects.com, tells us what we’ve learned from that director’s commentary.  Rob stupidly starts out with some ignorant snark:

As you undoubtedly know, Episode VIII in the ongoing Star Wars saga is one the highest-grossing films of all time and is universally loved by everyone whether they’ve seen it or not.

Okay.

There’s definitely no irrational and childish backlash against its female-led heroics…

Well, no.  There’s not.  Rather, what there is a backlash against instead, is the moronic feminist and SJW politics in The Last Jedi.  Remember, feminist ideology and the female gender are no longer inextricably linked thanks to male progressives who now claim to be feminists.  Criticism of feminism no longer automatically translates into criticism of women.

…or interpretation of the film universe’s fictional psychic ability, the Force. Nope.

Even in a fantasy setting, there are a set of rules one must follow, a kind of physics you set up when world building.  Otherwise, why not have Mickey Mouse fight alongside Rey?  They’re both Disney properties in a fictional universe after all.  Unfortunately, uneducated morons such as Rian and this writer won’t really ever be able to understand this, which is why they produce inferior products like The Last Jedi.

In any case Rob, you may want to consult other experts in your field who contend that there isn’t any backlash at all.

I’m not sure what any of that had to do with the commentary on the Blu-Ray, but I suppose the idiot activist inside of him just had to get those virtue signals out so that he could feel better about himself.

In any case, here’s what he purportedly learns from the commentary:

The opening joke — General Hux’s (Domhnall Gleeson) issues during his call with Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) — was something Johnson insisted on keeping as he wanted the film to be fun despite the expected heaviness of being the trilogy’s second chapter. “It’s gonna be okay to laugh at this movie.”

Unless you laugh at it in the wrong way, in which case you’ll get accused of being part of an irrational and childish backlash.

He saw a lot of potential for humor in the character of Hux and admits to playing with him “in a slightly more comic way.”

“Ruthless” military officers are often humorous.  If only Grand Moff Tarkin had been more like Frank Burns.

The idea that Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) would toss the light saber away made sense to Johnson. It stems from him thinking about why Luke would be on this faraway island in the first place. “He knows his friends are fighting this good fight. He knows there’s peril out there in the galaxy, and he’s exiled himself way out here.” He knew the answer couldn’t be mere cowardice and instead would be something more positive.

I didn’t perceive any positivity in Jake Skywalker.

Regarding Leia Organa’s (Carrie Fisher) space walk Johnson recalls Kathleen Kennedy’s reminders that Leia is a Skywalker too. She has powers, presumably beyond just sensing the loss of a loved one, “and we never see them manifest.” He says she realizes at this moment that she has more work to do, “and almost through instinct, almost like you hear about parents when their kids are caught under cars being able to get Hulk strength and lift them up, that’s kind of what I wanted this moment to be.”

More direction from Kathleen Kennedy.  Great.

Vice Admiral Holdo (Laura Dern) was originally much more “hippie dippy,” but they readjusted her character in editing and with pick-up shots.

She’s still pretty dippy hippie.

He wanted to approach the idea of “the Force” by explaining that it’s not a super power. “It’s not like making things float, it’s not like an Iron Man-type superpower that you get, or Iron Man doesn’t have super powers, I know I know I know I know. Iron Man’s suit does everything.” So he gave a gentler, more spiritual explanation of it all, “a little bit of a reset on it.”

And as a result he turned the Force into gobbledygook, just as George Lucas feared.

They shot a “teachable moment” sequence where Luke mentally fabricates an attack on the island village for Rey to respond to and then get angry about, but they decided it was unnecessary. It’s available on the deleted scenes.

Of course it was unnecessary.  Yoda even tells us that as a Mary Sue she already knows everything contained in the sacred Jedi texts.  No training is necessary, and we certainly wouldn’t want to have Luke mansplain the Force to Rey anyway.

The commentary was recorded before the film opened, “so I haven’t heard what anyone actually thinks about this.”

Well, he certainly heard what Kathleen Kennedy thought about it.

DJ’s “true cynicism” regarding the galaxy’s arms dealers and how they supply both “sides” in the eternal war “felt dangerous” to bring into the Star Wars universe, but he felt it was important to the film and Finn’s journey.

For political purposes.

Regarding the tension between Poe and Holdo, he credits the Battlestar Galactica reboot (one of the top five shows ever IMO) with inspiring the idea that there can be discord between the good guys.

That concept existed long before 2004.  What the hell is he talking about?

Ridley and Driver did an immense amount of training for their big shared fight against the Praetorian guards, and their efforts paid off in that Johnson didn’t have to use long lenses or editing trickery to conceal their inadequacies or the faces of stunt performers. He was able to shoot wide and show the two of them actually doing the fights.

He knew he wanted walkers as they’re one of his favorite designs “in all of movie history,” and while they wanted to update it they didn’t want to change it too much. They eventually settled on the “gorilla walker” style to imply their greater strength.

Good thing he avoided derivatives.

Feminist Almost Sees Reality Through Her SJW Haze

Jewel Queen from The Mary Sue writes a piece entitled, The Inclusive Illusion of Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

faQX1NE

If only feminists understood what reality looks like.

In it she writes,

While many critics and large numbers of fans have praised the film for its “new direction,” an undeniable backlash has grown against it. 

Undeniable?  We might think so.  But there’s plenty of people in the process of denying just such a thing.  Some folks are even openly calling for denial.  Read, here, here, here, and here.

Many fans of the movie have lumped all this criticism together as the same racist and misogynist fanboys who decried the inclusion of Finn from the first Force Awakens teaser…

Except that absolutely no one decried that.  It was a completely fabricated controversy.

…as well as the increase of women in Star Wars media.

This too is a completely fabricated controversy.  No one is decrying the increase of women in Star Wars media.  Rather, what some fans are decrying instead, is the injection of the pure idiocy of feminist ideology into Star Wars media.  That’s an important distinction to make.  I explain that in greater detail here.

Those hateful detractors certainly exist…

Actually, no, they don’t.

…but the limited perspective that all criticism is in that bad faith has masked the flaws of The Last Jedi in terms of feminism and diversity.

But that’s one of the primary problems we find in SJW psychopathology.  They instantly react to anything they dislike by calling it racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobic, homophobic, etc. etc. etc.  They do this whether or not the word actually applies, and indeed, whether or not they actually have an understanding of the definition of the word they’re using.  It’s actually really interesting to study this particular behavioral aberration.

The movie diminishes the role of its own female lead, mishandles its characters of color, and gives women and POC no meaningful impact on the final story.

You’re one of the very few feminists who has been able to see this.  I’d highly recommend reading articles by Erin White from Afropunk, and Lelanie Seyffer at Hypable, to learn more about your forbidden point of view.

When The Force Awakens came out, Rey was a shining light for female fans of Star Wars. While Rey was not the first important woman in the franchise, she was significant in being one of the main protagonists like Luke and Anakin.

Well, that’s part of the feminist misunderstanding of Star Wars right there.  There was never a main protagonist.  The Star Wars films were ensemble pieces:

It was heartwarming to see Rey have agency andhumanity. However, The Last Jedi strips these elements from her. Rather than the focus of Rey’s arc being on her Jedi training and character development, Rey is relegated to attempting to make Luke Skywalker return to the Resistance and trying to “save” Kylo Ren, even if he shows no signs of remorse.

It’s amazing how nonsensical and ridiculous things that can be contrived in a screenplay, isn’t it?

The issue here is that the story focuses more on how Luke feels about his past failures, and Kylo’s “reasons” for turning against Luke. It does not give any consideration to Rey’s emotions and choices, and even when it does, it is very weak.

Do we really need to learn about Rey’s emotions in a war movie?

In our current times, it’s disturbing how our female lead is expected to excuse a threatening and violent white man just because of his tragic backstory.

It is?  How many times has a female lead excused a threatening and violent white man just because of his tragic backstory?  I mean, specifically.  What specific instances are you referring to.  I’m asking, because I know that you composed that sentence thinking that it sounded wise, while not having any idea as to whether or not it represents an accurate reflection of factual reality.

The situation worsens as Rey goes on a suicide mission to save “Ben Solo.” Rey speaks of how she saw a vision of Kylo’s future in the Light Side, but we are simply told instead of shown. Even in the throne room sequence, Rey’s decisions are not at the center, as the big twist is Kylo choosing to kill his master, Supreme Leader Snoke.

Feminists always have to be at the center of everything.

Rey’s screen time even dropped from 43 minutes in TFA to 30 minutes in TLJ. She didn’t go on a compelling journey that expanded her character in any genuine way.

That’s because Rey’s not a compelling character that can be expanded upon in any genuine way.

In the first space battle, I was thrilled to meet Paige Tico, a Vietnamese female space pilot, only to get crushed after seeing her die without so much as one line of dialogue.

Fighter pilots do sometimes die in battle.

The damage grew worse with Finn’s treatment. Despite getting an injury so painful it put him in a coma, Finn wakes up, bangs his head, and walks around in nothing but a bacta suit on in his first scene, all for comedic relief. He’s demoted from a protagonist to side-character throughout his seventeen minutes of reduced screen time.

And those who haven’t let the past die, know when this sort of thing has been done before.

Rose is denied proper writing, as most of her time is spent preaching to Finn about how things like child slavery are bad—to a former child-soldier.

Don’t you understand?  She has to fem-splain things to Finn.

This has caused many fans to hate Rose, but imagine what could have been if she had been well written!

How are the SJW activists working in the Lucasfilm Story Group going to accomplish that exactly?

She’s also given a flat romance with Finn, after she sacrifices himself to save him to show how we must save what we love, which … he wasn’t already doing all along?

I don’t think anyone understands what they were doing all along.

Part of diversity is actively putting your characters of color in impactful roles and allowing them to live as most white leads do. 

You mean like Lando Calrissian, from 38 years ago?

Poe Dameron is also changed from the responsible and caring person he was in The Force Awakens to a reckless, disobedient, and glory-obsessed pilot. 

It’s what needed to happen, so that Holdo could teach him a deeply stupid feminist lesson.

Poe is forced to deal with his new leader, Admiral Holdo, who he has a right to question, as she denies any of the Resistance information about her plan.

You’re starting to think like a normal person.

Finally, The Last Jedi does not give the female characters and characters of color any other role than supporting their (white) male counterparts. 

It kind of makes you wonder why so many feminists think this film passes the worthless Bechdel Test, doesn’t it?

Rey’s job is to sway Luke, then Kylo, to her side. Rose has the job of teaching Finn something he already knew. Holdo exists to make Poe listen to women. And what about Leia Organa, who only hours ago lost her husband and, by the film’s conclusion, her brother? Leia is put in a coma after her Shooting Stars sequence, and no insight is given into how she feels, nor does she get to make meaningful decisions.

Well, the women in charge made the decision not to gas up before they left, which led to two days worth of failed missions and all but a dozen or so Resistance soldiers to their deaths.  I’d say that might be meaningful.

Like diversity, feminism is more than just having women on the screen.

But this was feminism on screen.  That’s precisely why it was so incredibly stupid.

Admiral Holdo is killed off to complete Poe’s character arc. It’s quite telling how one of the most memorable shots of the film is a woman sacrificing herself after she’s outlived her usefulness to the story.

When did Holdo have any usefulness?

Rose is left in a state of limbo at the film’s conclusion, and it’s implied that there might be a competition between her and Rey for Finn’s attention, because how feminist is it to have two women fighting over a man, right?

Actually, folks are thinking that Rose is going to get Jar-Jared and dropped from the narrative almost entirely.  But really, who cares either way?

The end product leaves all the female characters and characters of color without any meaningful impact on the story. 

This is probably news to Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy, who worked so hard to bring you their diversity fashion show.

This is disheartening because two years ago, Lucasfilm promised that everyone would be a part of Star Wars with the Sequel Trilogy. 

You can see what would happen if everyone was a part of Star Wars here.  Seriously though, Star Wars could never properly be about everyone.  Because everyone doesn’t fight in wars.  And that’s what Star Wars is about; war.  Hence the “wars” in Star Wars.

Fans who disliked this movie ought to be taken seriously, not lumped in the same boat as the men who call Rey a Mary Sue.

But the men who called Rey a Mary Sue had a legitimate point too.

If people do not listen to these concerns, Lucasfilm may repeat these mistakes with Episode 9.

They’re going to repeat many mistakes, because Lucsfilm no longer employs wise storytellers.  Rather, they employ naive political activists instead.

The fans need to rise up this time to give Rey, Finn, Poe, Rose, Leia, Holdo, and more the story they deserve.

I’m willing to bet that most fans don’t give a hoot about Rey, Finn, Poe, Rose or Holdo.  But only the box office for Episode IX will tell us for sure.

JJ and Rian Get Their Marching Orders From Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood has piggybacked Star Wars before to further their political agenda:

 

So Planned Parenthood’s latest antics should come as no surprise.

Tyler O’Neil from PJ Media reports:

On Tuesday morning, a Planned Parenthood affiliate posted a tweet demanding a Disney princess for each of five identity politics groups.

“We need a disney princess who’s had an abortion,” the list began. “We need a disney princess who’s pro-choice.”

In addition to these abortion-themed Disney princesses, Planned Parenthood Keystone also demanded other identity politics groups get representation in Disney films.

“We need a disney princess who’s an undocumented immigrant,” the affiliate tweeted. “We need a disney princess who’s actually a union worker. We need a disney princess who’s trans.”

Here’s a screencap of the tweet that Planned Parenthood has since deleted:

Disney-Princess-Tweet

Why did Planned Parenthood delete the tweet?  Josh Hafner of USA Today reports on Planned Parenthood‘s response:

“Today, we joined an ongoing Twitter conversation about the kinds of princesses people want to see in an attempt to make a point about the importance of telling stories that challenge stigma and championing stories that too often don’t get told,” said Melissa Reed, Planned Parenthood’s president and CEO. “Upon reflection, we decided that the seriousness of the point we were trying to make was not appropriate for the subject matter or context, and we removed the tweet.”

If you can decipher that gobbledygook, more power to you.  But not so fast here.  Let’s look at this a bit more.

It could be argued that we already have our union worker princess in the way of Rose Tico, given her drab jumpsuit and silly social justice lectures.  So we know that Disney is not at all adverse to delivering on these SJW demands.

Although, I’m not sure how a princess could be an “undocumented immigrant” in the Star Wars franchise.  Would it have anything to do with the Trade Federation?  I’m sure that the activists writing Lucasfilm propaganda will sort it all out.

So that leaves us with trans, pro-choice, and having had an abortion.  Got that JJ and Rian?

Rian Johnson Gets A Satisfying Beat Out Of The Intimate

Melia Robinson of Yahoo News reports:

In one of the movie’s most memorable scenes, Rey and Kylo Ren are able to communicate with one another from across the galaxy through the Force. They’re able to see each other and their surroundings.

Rey then reaches out to hold Kylo Ren’s hand. He removes his glove and feels her touch through the Force.

“Star Wars: The Last Jedi” director Rian Johnson told fans that this moment between the movie’s heroine and rebellious rogue is probably the steamiest the franchise will get.

During his talk at the SXSW film festival on Monday, Johnson responded to a fan’s question about why there are so many close-up shots of hands in “The Last Jedi.” The director said it’s always “tempting” to make a simple scene over-the-top, especially when the budget permits, but it’s more rewarding “if you can get a satisfying beat out of the intimate.”

“The ultimate expression of that is focusing [the shot] even tighter when there’s contact. To me, one of my favorite shots of the movie is those two fingers touching,” Johnson said.

He added, “It’s the closest thing we’ll get to a sex scene in a ‘Star Wars’ movie.”

The crowd erupted in laughter.

0318-rian-johnson-getty-5

Getting a satisfying beat out of the intimate.

Having let the past die, or having not seen the Original Trilogy films, Rian is unaware of the sequence in TESB when the Falcon flies into the center of a hollowed out asteroid.  While there, Leia works on the Falcon and hurts her hand in the process.  Han grabs Leia’s hand and starts rubbing it.  Leia says, “Don’t, my hands are dirty.”   Han Says, “My hands are dirty too.”  I understand that everything is brand spanking new in the neo-Victorian age of the SJW where they’ve let the past die.  But that TESB sequence is a bit more steamy than merely showing close-up shots of hands, or two fingers touching.  But apparently in Rian Johnson’s parallel universe, pulling someone’s finger is akin to a sex scene.

HanLeia

More than just pulling a finger.