Conflict Between Alden and Ron Howard?

SC Reviews has an interesting perspective on the recent Esquire interview with Alden Ehrenreich:

From Esquire:

Of Lord and Miller, Ehrenreich says, “They had a different style than Ron in terms of the way we were working.” He’s not sure what their Solo would have been like. He liked the script. He liked them as directors. He can’t say whether they were really taking an Apatovian riffs-over-script approach. “From the first screen test on, we played around with it a lot. We tried a lot of different things, rethinking behind the scenes,” he says. “That was yielding a different movie than the other factions wanted. I knew what I was doing, but in terms of what that adds up to, you’re so in the dark as an actor. You don’t know what it’s shaping up to be, how they’re editing it, so it’s kind of impossible without having seen those things to know what the difference [of opinion] was, or exactly what created those differences.”

He wasn’t told that Lord and Miller were being replaced until it happened, he says. The directors themselves told him almost immediately. “They said, ‘We were let go,’ and that’s it. They had mentioned there were some disagreements before, but they didn’t get into it. They wished me the best with the rest of the movie. On a personal level, it felt emotional, for them to be going after we’d set out on that course together. Because I spent a lot of time with them, and we had a really good relationship—they also cast me. But I think at that point, they were kind of on board with [the decision], too. Like, ‘This is what’s happening.’ That’s not what they said to me, but that was the vibe I got.”

Ehrenreich says the fan-press rumor that it was he who approached Kennedy with concerns about Lord and Miller is “not at all” true, that he couldn’t imagine ever making a call like that “unless people were being put in danger or something.”

He also insists that the story about Lucasfilm forcing Lord and Miller to bring in an acting coach—later identified as writer- director Maggie Kiley—to work on his performance has been mischaracterized: “She was part of conversations that happened for a couple weeks at one point,” Ehrenreich says, “but that was basically it.” (Lord and Miller say that Kiley is someone they’d worked with on previous films and that they brought her on Solo as a resource for the entire cast as well as themselves.) As for the various stories about the Solo crew breaking into spontaneous applause upon hearing of Howard’s appointment or (depending on which account you read) Lord and Miller’s firing?

“That’s bullshit,” Ehrenreich says. “For a crew to do that would mean they hated [Lord and Miller], which was not by any stretch the case.”

The production went dark for almost three weeks between Lord and Miller’s sacking and Howard’s arrival. “It was this period of going, What if they get somebody that you don’t get along with? What if they get somebody that has a totally different vision?” Ehrenreich admits. But he adds that Howard won over the cast and crew quickly.

“Everybody’s hackles are raised a bit, and Ron had this ability to come in and deal with morale and get everybody enthusiastic about, A, what we’d already shot, because I think his feeling was that a lot of what we’d already done was really good, and, B, the direction for the next piece of it. He knew how to navigate a tricky situation, and almost from the first or second day everybody pretty quickly recharged and got excited again about the movie.” (Lord and Miller ended up with executive-producer credits on the film. Everyone involved is cagey about how much of their material ended up in the final cut.)

It’s interesting that these sentiments towards Lord & Miller, are similar to sentiments expressed previously be fellow cast members who also worked under the duo on this film.

“Obviously, it was a surprise. I love Phil and Chris — everybody loves Phil and Chris — they’re so brilliant.” -Thandie Newton

“I will tell you this much though,” Williams adds. “What saddens me most is I was very proud of the work that I did. What I believe I have created with Emilia Clarke and Woody Harrelson and Alden [Ehrenreich, who plays Solo]… I thought it was some great work. We was on the spaceship, and we all had these amazing scenes together, and I thought it was a great opportunity, and I thought it was some great stuff. It’s unfortunate the world won’t get to see it.” – Michael K. Williams

People who worked with Lord & Miller on this film, seem to have good things to say about their experiences.

han-solo-thandie-newton-ron-howard-set-image-820x490

I can’t find any pics of Howard with his arm around Alden…

Ethan Van Sciver, puts forth the theory that Alden Eherenreich also has a bit of a beef with Ron Howard, and that it was Ron Howard himself who leaked rumors that Alden couldn’t act.  Ethan also suggests that the reason that Alden let it slip that he’s signed up for three films, is that perhaps Lucasfilm may be looking to fire Alden, if Ron Howard doesn’t particularly care for him.

I’d only add, that if any of this is the case, then we should start to see comments from other cast and crew members echoing issues with Ron Howard.  The truth will eventually come out, because it always does.

In all of this though, I can’t help but think of Lord & Miller’s reactions and responses about the casting of Alden in the following video.  They don’t really appear to be too happy about the topic.  Something seems amiss and awkward with regards to Alden’s casting.

Don’t Be Fooled By The He/She Back And Forth In Enfys Nest Marketing

I’ve previously discussed how Enfys Nest is in fact Qi’Ra in disguise.  I’ve also discussed the contradictory pronouns in Enfys Nest marketing material that are meant to protect the integrity of the big reveal of Enfys Nest as Qi’Ra in the film’s purported twist ending.  Now comes word of more pronoun contradictions from Jeremy at Geeks + Gamers.

Expect more to follow.

Do not be fooled by this marketing ploy.

What the political activists at Lucasfilm are attempting to do is deliver another moronic social justice lesson.  After the film is released, the cast and crew will talk about how brilliant it was to put out contradictory information on Enfys Nest’s gender in order to keep people guessing, and how it really goes to show that gender equality is a real thing, and that you shouldn’t let gender bias affect your viewpoints, and it’s going to be a really hard lesson for the chauvinist character Han Solo to learn, and don’t all those means-spirited middle-aged OT fans feel stupid for calling Rey a Mary Sue, and don’t all those misogynists feel silly for roasting Rose Tico and Holdo, because this really shows everyone that girls can be just as manly as men can be, because nobody had a clue what Enfys Nest’s gender was…yadda, yadda, yadda.

In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if all the Behind-The-Scenes Blu-Ray extras for this film, recording the cast and crew saying all of that, has already been recorded and edited.

But anyone with even a cursory knowledge of life drawing and the human anatomy, and the thought process involved in SJW political activism, will be able to see right through this transparent charade:

QiRaEnfysNest

Social justice politics are no mystery.

Shipper Bait

Hando

Chris Lee of Vulture.com reports on a 6 minute sequence from Solo shown at CinemaCon:

As the pile of chips grows in front of Han — whom Lando first calls “Haaan” before being corrected — Lando begins to lose his cool. Just then, Solo goes all in, pushing all his money into the pot. “Whoa, whoa, whoa, slow down,” Lando says. “You might want to quit while you’re ahead.”

“You might want to quit while you’re behind,” Han responds.

“You’re adorable,” Lando fires back.

A ripple of recognition shuddered through the Caesar’s Palace Ballroom as conventioneers registered this film’s reinterpretation of Star Wars’ iconic rivals. Despite months of negative buzz and the uncertainty surrounding Solo in light of its original directors being fired and replaced, suffice it to say the material played well in the room.

Normal people would interpret this as banter between rivals as one attempts to belittle the other.

But you can bet your bottom dollar, that Hando shippers will be swooning over this from now until the movie’s release.

Alden Confirms That He Is Signed Up For Three Han Solo Films

Alex Pappadamas from Esquire interviews Alden Ehrenreich.  It’s a lengthy article that goes into some of the controversies around the production, with new statements from Lord & Miller which contradict earlier rumors, and so on and so forth.  As far as I’m’ concerned, the real story won’t really come out until everyone’s NDAs expire.

But there was this little interesting tidbit:

I ask Ehrenreich how many he’s signed up for.

“Three,” he says, then flinches, understanding he may have just created a disturbance in the Force. “I don’t know if that’s officially, uh, public. But—yeah.” 

Solo

Triple your pleasure, triple your fun.

Star Peace

I previously discussed the controversy over the removal of the blasters from the International Solo posters.  I also discussed Disney’s purported response to the removal, and how it conflicted with the known political climate in Brazil over the public debate on firearms.  I explained how it didn’t matter if the posters were international, since the political motivation for removing the blasters was the same despite being designed for Brazil.  I then repeated that explanation in response to Star Wars Explained’s inappropriate admonishment of Jeremy at Geeks + Gamers.

Star_PEACE_sm

Now Jeremy has discovered the same altered blasterless character images, now being used for American character posters.

If you still doubt that there is a political agenda at work here, read the following sentence from the new Han Solo novel Last Shot, which describes what happened when Han Solo brought a toy blaster home for a young Kylo Ren to play with:

He brought Ben a play blaster from Burundang and he was encouraging his violent side;

Pretty soon, every commanding officer in the Resistance will be some sort of space hippie like Holdo.

UPDATE:

Just a point of clarification here.

Jeremy is not speaking about the British Solo posters, which were released on the Star Wars UK Twitter feed, all of which sport blasters:

 

Rather what Jeremy is referring to instead, are the new blasterless character posters for the United States:

If you’ll recall, Disney purported responded to ScreenRant, specifically stating that, “First of all, the posters arent for the United States. They’re posters for Brazil.”

And yet, here are the very same blasterless images now in the United States poster. Compare and contrast:

Maybe Disney is trolling us.

 

Lucasfilm Pulls A Crazy Ivan To Save The Integrity Of Solo’s Twist Ending

Recently SWNN’s anonymous insider leaked some details to them about the sex of the Solo villain, Enfys Nest:

“Enfys Nest is a female. It is not a big role, but it is important. She (the actress) worked closely with Woody Harrelson. She is signed for two more movies, presumably Solo sequels.”

This was seemingly confirmed by independent information, coming from French merchandising.

The text in the image apparently translates as:

“Enfys Nest, an extremely dangerous marauder, has quickly forged an infamous reputation for herself and her gang of pirates – the Cloud Riders.”

This along with some other accompanying clues, is what led me to deduce that Enfys Nest is in fact Qi’Ra, a revelation that would provide the big ending twist in the film that some are reporting on.

QiRaEnfysNest

Not so mysterious.

But in a transparent attempt to maintain the integrity of this twist, Lucasfilm is publishing material that claims that Enfys Nest is a man.

Kevin Burwick from Movieweb.com reports on a description of Enfys Nest published in Lucasfilm’s Star Wars Insider Magazine:

“Busy carving out a nefarious reputation as the violent and enigmatic leader of a gang of swoop-riding pirates, the Cloud Riders, the deadly Enfys Nest is an extremely dangerous and brutal marauder. With his face always obscured beneath a fearsome helmet, Nest is deadly, athletic, and percussively vicious.”

You can see an image of the text from the magazin here:

Kevin postulates:

Since this new information about Solo comes from an officially licensed source, it lends itself to be more reliable than the previous sources of information.

But, isn’t the text on the French merchandising also from an officially licensed source?

If it turns out that we have a poor translation of that French merchandising text, I’ll be happy to update this post with that information.

Sebastian Peris from Heroic Hollywood speculates:

Of course, this could be an attempt to keep a surprise reveal in the film under wraps…

I tend to agree.  If all of the information seen so far can be taken at face value, and if the translation of the French merchandising is accurate, then I see this as an attempt by Lucasfilm to correct course and maintain the mystery of Enfys Nest’s gender and the big reveal at the end, by publishing contradictory information after the French merchandising either accidentally or improperly let the cat out of the bag.

UPDATE:

As reported by SWNN, Star Wars Insider has published a description of Qi’Ra which strengthens my suspicion that she is Enfys Nest:

As a child Qi’ra was just another powerless street urchin, making her way as best she could on the grim thoroughfares of Corellia. Running with a street kid named Han, she was determined to move up in the world and gain status and reputation. As she got older, Qi’ra had grown into an independent young woman – clever and calculating , with a sophisticated edge and a knack for devious skullduggery.

Qi’ra is a secretive woman of the shadows, but who she really is is hidden away, and visible only to those she trusts. When her path crosses with Han’s once again, Qi’ra is destined to become an influential force in the life of the young smuggler.

SJW Attempts To Shame Normal Person

Remember Neil Harrington?  He’s the wise sage from dorksideoftheforce.com who called for everyone in fandom to just get along.

What’s he doing now?  Well, he’s now got a new piece up at fansided entitled, Crybaby Star Wars fan’s boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story due to ‘feminazi agenda’ of Star Wars.

doublefacepalm_2-1

Gee, I never read anyone refer to Backlashers as crybabies before.  How original.

In his article Neil comments on a very well articulated YouTube video which can be seen here:

Neil stupidly writes:

A crybaby, Star Wars fan is boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story for all the wrong reasons, proving once again how out of touch with reality some people genuinely are.

Let’s get something straight here.  SJWs are wholly unqualified to comment on the nature of reality.  This of course is because their modern ideology originally stumbled out of the LSD-laden piss holes of Woodstock back in the late 1960s.  So their entire ideology is founded on distortion of reality.  But Neil continues anyway.

Solo: A Star Wars Story is nearly a month away, and many Star Wars fans are excited about another film within a galaxy far, far away. Others, not so much — and that’s okay.

As long as they’re not interested in it for reasons that you approve of apparently.

Meanwhile, a Star Wars “YouTuber” is not happy with the direction of what he has termed “Disney’s Star Wars,” making a “look at me” video in response.

“Look at me” is the whole point of the video format.  It’s a visual medium at which people look.

Before I get started, I want to make something (kyber) crystal clear.

Self-appointed authority and massive stupidity always walks hand in hand.  It’s a universal constant.  How’s that for crystal clarity?

It’s perfectly acceptable to not like all of the Star Wars content. That’s not the point of this response, not in the slightest. It’s the reasonings and entitlement of some Star Wars fans, like this guy, that’s garnered this response.

So it’s perfectly acceptable to not like all of the Star Wars content, as long as people don’t like the content for reasonings that you approve of.  Got it.  Who exactly appointed you to make this determination for everyone else?

Honestly, the only people that I’ve seen express entitlement, are the SJWs who have been screaming their moronic demands for equal representation and gender equality to Disney ever since George Lucas sold his company.  Normal people were always perfectly fine with accepting whatever stories that George Lucas wanted to tell in whatever form they took, warts and all.

Also, his hateful remarks about women really got my Midichlorians boiling.

His hateful remarks about women are a figment of your imagination.  He never made any such “hateful” remarks.

Though, I have to admit, I’d be interested to see what happens to your blood boiling point when you read one of my “Vagi-Chlorian” comments.

Also, this particular fanboy is making all sorts of claims against Disney and its direction which are flat out wrong.

Actually, it’s your own comments that are flat out wrong.  And I’m happy to correct you.

Right off the bat, the camera angles and long, dramatic shots of Gabriel (the creator of this video) walking languidly up and down bleachers show what this video is really about. It’s about him. It’s not about presenting a topic of conversation or facilitating a civil debate. He wants us to look at him and, Gabriel, you’ve got your wish.

Well yeah.  He’s about to express his opinion.  So it is about him, and how he feels towards the Star Wars franchise.  What exactly is wrong with that?   I mean, besides nothing whatsoever.

“Never thought I’d say this, but I’m boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story. The only way to get Star Wars back to where it was, is to simply say. No.”

Cool, bro. You don’t have to see it. No one is “Forcing” you to do so.

He never claimed that anyone was forcing him to see the film.  So why would you respond to a comment that he never made?

“Disney continues to shove down their SJW feminazi agenda down our retinas.” 

You mean creating characters, such as Daisy Ridley’s Rey, meant to empower women is a bad thing? Women holding an equal place within the Star Wars universe is bad? I don’t know where you get your delusions, laser brain.

Well no.  He doesn’t mean that creating characters, such as Mary Sue Rey, meant to empower women is a bad thing.  That’s why the sentence that he actually spoke doesn’t contain those words in that order.  He also didn’t say that holding an equal place within the Star Wars universe is bad either.  That also is a fabrication of your own making.  So the reason that you don’t understand where he gets his “delusions,” is that you’re consistently responding to points that he’s not making.

Rather, what he did say instead, was that, “Disney continues to shove down their SJW feminazi agenda down our retinas.”  Pay particular note to how the sentence that you wrote, and the sentence that he spoke, contain different words.  This of course means that the two sentences contain different meanings and intent.

It’s always important to respond to what people actually say and write, rather than to respond to what you wish they had said and written, just because you have some well-rehearsed pre-fabricated counterpoint to recite.

Why would he even make such a comment when women have had an equal place in Star Wars from the very beginning, for 40 years now?

The real problem as I see it is that women, or more accurately feminists, are more equal than others in the current state of the franchise.  A great reason to abandon it for something else that SJWs will barnacle to in 40 years.

Gabriel even claims that he’s not sexist.

Um, yes you are. News flash: if you use the term “feminazi” you’re a sexist.

Um, no.  He isn’t.  News Flash: feminist ideology and the female gender are no longer inextricably linked in the 21st Century.  This of course is thanks to male progressives who now claim to be feminists.  So criticism of the pure idiocy of modern feminist ideology does not automatically translate into criticism of women.

The recent trend of inclusion within a galaxy far, far away is a necessity (true there is still room for improvement, but they’re moving in the right direction) and kudos to Kathleen Kennedy for embracing it. Speaking of which, he lets the President of Lucasfilm have it.

Recent trend?  Where have you uneducated SJWs been for the last 40 yearsAre you even remotely aware that it’s 2018, and not 1968?

He goes on to complain that Rey is powerful “without any training,” and that any character can now be powerful for no reason. You mean like Anakin Skywalker, who is mysteriously created by the Force?

Well no.  Anakin had a strong connection with the Force.  But he still received training from Obi-Wan.  That was the whole point of the Prequel Trilogy.  Anakin was Obi-Wan’s apprentice.  Have you watched the films?

A nobody, like Rey?

Ha!  Aren’t you going to be surprised when JJ Abrams retcons that in Episode IX and makes Rey Luke’s niece.

Or, Luke Skywalker, who was able to blow up the Death Star with five minutes of training with an aging Jedi?

Well that’s a pretty stupid argument.  Luke’s ability to blow up the Death Star had little to do with Jedi training.

Luke flew his T-16 back home on Tatooine through Beggar’s Canyon in which he shot womp rats which were about as big as the exhaust port on the Death Star.  That effectively acted as a real world simulation of the Death Star Run.  This was all stated by Luke during the presentation to the pilots showing them how to attack the Death Star.  Obi-Wan’s voice guided him through at the end, but primarily to encourage Luke to believe in his own abilities and experience.

Again, have you watched the films?

If you’re going to criticize Rey, then you have to slam the Skywalkers, too.

No, you don’t.  Not if you’ve actually watched all the films.

When we first meet Luke, he’s a naive inexperienced farm boy, who complains about wanting to hang out with friends, gets scolded by his Uncle, gets knocked unconscious by a Tusken Raider, gets pushed down in a bar by a drunkard, has to be defended by an elderly Jedi, gets insulted and his hand slapped by Han, gets insulted by Leia, gets mauled by a Wampa, gets shot down in his snowspeeder by an AT-AT, crash lands on a swamp planet, and gets his hand cut off during his very first lightsaber duel.

Not Rey though. She gets to skip the first phase of the hero’s journey so hear her roar! Somehow, she can pilot the Millennium Falcon and use a lightsaber all without any training at all. Sure she fumbles a bit getting the Falcon off the ground, but in only a couple of minutes, she’s evading Tie Fighters and deftly flying through the tight spaces of wrecked Star Destroyers. Not only is she Han Solo, but she’s Luke Skywalker too! Effectively fighting off a trained Knight of Ren, whatever that is, in her very first lightsaber battle. But don’t you dare question her girl power you misogynist, even though it doesn’t leave much left for Finn to shine with.

If your only criticisms are leveled at the female characters who receive the exact same character development as the male characters…that’s sexist.

They didn’t receive the exact same character development.  Watching the films makes this self evident.

He even claims Disney delayed the novel and Blu-ray release due to “plot holes” in The Last Jedi. Really, now? How did you get that insider information, Gabriel?

Reading the novels and comics is insider information now?  Anyone who can rub two brain cells together can see from the released material in novels and comics that they are being used to plug up what some call plot holes.  It’s transparent.

Don’t present opinion and conjecture as fact.

See the above linked facts.

The plans for both releases were well known before The Last Jedi premiered (we even wrote up an article on it); and before the complaints of some fans.

Great.  That doesn’t change the nature of the actual material within those releases.

Of course, Disney wants to make money. They only forked out $4 billion to buy the franchise. That does not mean that they aren’t committed to producing high-quality films or that they don’t care about the franchise whatsoever. If you don’t like the material, don’t buy it. You’re a real hero for doing your small part to take down Disney!

Well, that’s the real trick, isn’t it?  But let’s be perfectly honest here.  What you’re doing is attempting to shame this man into financially supporting a political agenda you approve of, and at the same time trying to discourage others from following in his footsteps.  You’re doing this, because you’re painfully aware that there aren’t enough of you SJW dimwits to financially support the franchise yourselves.

But, Gabriel’s complaint that Ehrenreich doesn’t sound or look anything like Harrison Ford, thus making him unworthy of being Han Solo, is ridiculous.

Far from being ridiculous, convincing the audience that Alden is Han Solo is the biggest challenge this film has.  One that could have been easily overcome by simply casting the right man.

Ron Howard has been very clear that he wasn’t looking for Ehrenreich to give his imitation of Ford, but present us with his own take on the character. He doesn’t have to sound or look exactly like Ford — Ehreinech needs to embrace his inner scoundrel.

Sure, Ron Howard has been very clear on that.  But it doesn’t matter if Ron Howard has been very clear on that.  What matters in the end, is how the audience perceives the work.

Last and certainly not least. The “boycott” on Solo: A Star Wars Story isn’t actually a boycott. Gabriel says that he might see it once it comes on Blu-ray DVD. So, how is that a boycott (you keep using that word but I don’t think it means what you think it means)? Your 11-minute video, Gabriel, has more plot holes than any movie you complained about.

The non-boycott “boycott” is proof that this Star Wars fanboy is out of touch with reality and displays, in a nutshell, all that’s wrong within the fanbase of a galaxy far, far away.

He’s not going to see it theatrically.  That’s a theatrical boycott.  So you shouldn’t be lecturing others about the definitions of words, when you yourself don’t understand the ones that you’re typing out.

Heck, it’s clear that you haven’t even watched the films, so you really shouldn’t be commenting on them very much at all.

But here’s the bottom line:

Normal people don’t organize boycotts in the same frenzied manner that SJW savages do.  Sure occasionally a few of the normals try to start a boycott when they’re passionate about something.  But generally speaking, normal people will simply shrug their shoulders, and walk away from the franchise.  No organizing will be necessary.  SJW politics will do all the heavy lifting in pushing normal people away from the franchise.

In fact, the box office and the waning merchandise and toy sales demonstrate that this has already begun.

UPDATE:

The talented filmmaker who created Gabriel’s video has posted his own response to Neil Harrington’s dorksideoftheforce.com article:

UPDATE:

The brilliant Ethan Van Sciver just took Harrington’s article on:

UPDATE:

Gabriel provides a follow up video:

UPDATE:

Jeremy from Geeks + Gamers adds his own commentary:

Chinese Movie Goers Not Excited For Solo

The Chinese Box Office for The Last Jedi was a dismal disaster.  It looks as though Solo may be heading for the same fate in China.

Variety reports on the May 25th release date set for China.  In their article, was this little tidbit:

Chinese moviegoers do not seem to be impressed by the arrival of a new chapter. One wrote on Douban: “Two-star expectations only. Better safe than sorry.”

So we can expect a multitude of apologist articles talking about the great cultural divide and a lack of nostalgic ties to the Star Wars franchise, despite Black Panther doing very well in the same nation.

Unless of course Lucasfilm fails to deliver on Hando.  If they don’t, then SJWs will join in the cacophony of bitter criticism too.

Han-Solo-1-810x400

Don’t act so surprised.

Hando

Stephan Kyriazis writes a speculative article at express.co.uk entitled, Han Solo new trailer reveals Lando is BISEXUAL? Watch him FLIRT with Han.

hanlando

A match made in heaven.

The trailer that Stephan refers to can be seen here:

In his article, Stephan asks:

DID the new Solo: A Star Wars Story just reveal the first ever gay or bisexual character after fans go wild for this flirting scene between Lando and an amused Han Solo?

It’s been a long time coming.

C-3PO may be the most flamboyant droid in this or any galaxy near or far, far away but Star Wars has never introduced an openly non-heterosexual character on the big screen.

No wonder there is excitement over the latest Solo trailer which shows formerly shameless ladies’ man Lando Calrissian “flirting” with a smiling Han Solo. He even calls him “Babe.” Some fans hvae also seized on the young Lando’s rather stylish and flashy wardrobe as further evidence, althoug the older Billy Dee Williams Leia-loving incarnation also had quite the flair for fashion.

Kathleen Kennedy has been promising to shake up the Star Wars universe for a while now and this would be the biggest step yet. Is Star Wars about to give fans an LGBTQXI icon?

Fans have already seized on the budding signs after a previous trailer also showed Lando use a flirty affectionate tone when he tells Han: ”You might want to buckle up, baby.”

With the latest scene fans have gone into overdrive, or possibly hyperdrive.

The moment comes after Lando takes Han onto the Millennium Falcon and drawls: “Every ship isn’t for everyone. She needs a particular type of pilot.”

Hardly the sexiest line in movie history but his posture, smile and phrasing give it extra meaning which is exposed by his droid accomplice. L3-37 then drily comments: “You done flirting?”

Fans are now hoping for more of the same when the movie hits the big screen in May.

One said :”They only thing I expect from the Solo movie is a lot of flirting between Han and Lando.”

The last comment points out the fact that Disney and Lucasfilm have a habit of editing trailers to give misleading cues about characters and scenes.

Lando could be calling someone else “Babe” in the movie or flirting with Emilia Clarke’s Qi’ra.

Will the Solo movie duck away from portraying anything outsite a narrow heteronormative narrative or will they finally introduce a character with a rather more fluid or playful sexuality?

MJ Franklin writing at Mashable has a more definitive theory:

The math is very simple here: Alden Ehrenreich is an absolute snack boo thang and Donald Glover is an absolute snack boo thang, and the characters they play are absolute snack boo thangs. You put all of that together, and you get, well, this:

Y’all, this is first date fodder. We are watching Han and Lando’s first date.

And, to make it clear that no this flirting is NOT just wishful thinking, Disney threw in a little clip of Lando calling Han “baby,” just for good measure.

Only one thing is for sure; if SJWs are getting their hopes up on a bisexual Han/Lando relationship (dare I call it Hando?), then there will be SJW hell to pay for Lucasfilm if the movie doesn’t live up to that expectation.

So, what do we have to do to get some good lesbian action in this franchise?