20 Points That Slumming Through SJW “Think” Pieces Teaches Us

So I’ve been pouring over SJW “think” pieces for several months now.  Given that SJWs mostly all think alike, there are some common themes that run through their articles.  So there’s something of genuine value to learn here, with regards to increasing the effectiveness of our arguments.



I’ve written here about the waning box office for The Last Jedi immediately after the opening weekend.  I’ve pointed out that in China, where people have no nostalgic attachment to the franchise, it was perceived as garbage.  The waning toy and merchandise sales point to further problems.  Not one SJW is able to acknowledge any of this.  They’re somehow under the impression that Star Wars is too big to fail, that it will always be around no matter what, and that it will always make money.  This may be that many of them aren’t old enough to remember a time without Star Wars, so they can’t imagine life without it.  They haven’t seen the Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers franchises come and go.  They haven’t witness the slow fading of the Star Trek franchise from its height in the mid 1990s.  So they think that Star Wars is forever, when in fact, nothing is.


When someone criticizes Disney Star Wars for its heavy handed feminist messaging, the SJW will use that as an opportunity to call the critic a sexist and/or misogynist.  But remember, in 2018 feminism and the female gender are no longer inextricably linked.  Thanks to SJW activistsmen now routinely and proudly proclaim themselves to be feminists.  So feminist ideology and the female gender are two different things in the modern era.  Criticism of feminism, does not automatically translate into de facto criticism of the women in the 21st Century.


Time and time again they talk about diversity in the Sequel Trilogy as though it’s a brand new thing in Star Wars.  When discussing diversity in Star Wars, they almost never mention Samuel L. Jackson, or Temuera Morrison.  They rarely mention Billy Dee Williams.  This is why they stupidly call critics racists, sexists, and/or misogynists; they don’t think females or minorities have ever been in the films before 2015.  Some of the brighter ones will argue that they’re talking about a primary character.  But that betrays the fact that they haven’t really watched the films, because the films were always ensemble pieces without a singular primary character.


Early on, few if any of them refused to acknowledge that the backlash even existed.  But as the backlash grew louder, and they were forced to acknowledge it, they then attempted to dismiss it as a “tiny vocal minority.”  The truth is more likely that it is they, who are in the minority.  And that’s why just as of this week they’ve taken to openly attacking and admonishing backlashers.  They’e gone so far as to mischaracterize Backlashers as racists and misogynists, despite the fact that the Backlash itself is diverse.


Many of them seem to feel that the Star Wars franchise was going nowhere until Disney purchased it.  They feel this despite a highly successful Clone Wars television series on the air, and the Sequel Trilogy already being developed by Lucasfilm prior to the Disney purchase.


This after they screamed to the high heavens with their own entitlement for equal representation and gender equality when Disney bought the franchise.  This despite the fact that a war time setting doesn’t really warrant perfect gender equality, since it’s primarily men who fight wars.


It’s a sad fact that Lucasfilm currently employs political activists rather than artists.  We’ve seen this truth not only in the new material they’re producing under Disney, but also in the public comments from Lucasfilm representatives as well.


This goes both for SJW fans and professional critics.


A number of articles have called for a “ceasefire” from the BacklashWhen so doing, they start taking this authoritative tone, instructing Backlashers what is or is not acceptable forms of criticism.  As amusing as it is, it’s important to remind them of the reality that they have no authority over anything.


They’ll attribute The Last Jedi audience score to Russian bots and racist/misogynist hackers, but can’t explain why Black Panther’s score and public reception wasn’t also affected by the same phantoms.  They’re unable to comprehend, that one was a bad movie, and that they other was good.  Occam’s Razer and all of that.


Both the SJW fans and the SJWs within Lucasfilm, think they’re “Resisting” President Trump. What’s Trump’s agenda?  The GOP/Republican agenda.  What’s the GOP/Republican agenda?  Smaller limited government.  So they’re resisting smaller limited government, which they apparently think is authoritarian fascism.  But let’s translate this into Star Wars to demonstrate how nonsensical this all is, and ask some simple questions:

So the First Order is a fascist government complete with stormtroopers. Would a fascist government support small limited government? How does one impose a fascist state with small limited government? Don’t you need big government in order to impose a fascist state?  How can you be authoritarian without a big government to back up your authority?  Who is it that supports big government?

So they’re political understanding is absolutely upside down.



Far too often fans forget that the word “wars” appears in the title of the franchise.  Most of these SJW fans seem to think that the franchise is about cute cosplay outfits.


Feminist writer after feminist writer type out silly sentences such as this:

But in the context of a franchise that has been known to use women’s bodies as an enticement for viewers it’s also a clear sign that the creators know that straight white men aren’t the only audience they’re catering to anymore.”

Not one of them seems to understand the proper context or intention of the gold bikini, which was not male audience gratification.  I’ve explained the context of Leia’s gold bikini here.


SJWs happen to like getting indoctrinated with politics that they already agree with.  It gives them a sense of affirmation.  But with no fundamental understanding of basic economics, they don’t understand that paying customers walking away means that their political propaganda will no longer be funded.  So they tell you to go “find something else that brings you joy” or some such nonsense.  A few of them however do understand this, which is why those few attempt to shame critics into silence so they can continue to have their political propaganda funded.


Lucasfilm is currently staffed with political activists rather than genuine artists.  This is self evident to any educated thinking person.  The SJW though, sees what Lucasfilm is currently producing as art, not having any real experience or education into what political propaganda looks like.  This is why the silly Bechdel Test will determine for them whether or not they like a movie.


When feminists attempt to be “gender equal,” many of them will put on their best performance as to what they think men act like.  We see this expressed in the character of Holdo, and to some extent, Rey.  They seem to think that men in the military go around slapping each other in the face and holding back cocky pilots all day long.  But, men don’t really act this way by and large, unless it’s really necessary.  It is truly bizarre though, that out of one side of their mouths they’ll prattle on endlessly about “toxic masculinity,” but then out of the other side of their mouth they’ll whine that they want equal representation in a war movie.  I’m not sure how they reconcile that.


Part of this is that they have some pre-rehearsed rhetoric that they’re dying to spew.  Part of it is that they want to deflect the conversation into some other area where they’re better prepared.  Part of it is that they seek to mischaracterize what you actually have said or written, into what they want people to think that you’ve said or written.  In either of these cases, it’s always equally bizarre.


Nearly all of their articles cite the straight white male in some form, along with an accompanying pejorative.  That form of bigotry seems to be not just acceptable, but also highly fashionable among today’s SJW ignorati given how commonplace it is in their work.  Make no mistake, the SJWs within Lucasfilm have the same problem.


They’ll often prove this by attempting to compare Rey to Luke, and claiming that if Rey is a Mary Sue, then Luke is one too.  It’s more of that equality nonsense that they try to force onto every aspect of life.  As I explain in my review of The Force Awakens, this comparison is ridiculous, if you’ve actually watched the films.  Clearly, many have not, and are basing their opinions on brief clips, what they’ve seen at conventions, or what they’ve heard other people say or read other people write, etc.

20. SJWs will never be happy or satisfiedNot ever.

And there you have it.  These 20 points pretty much describe the main talking points in any Star Wars related SJW written article that you’ll read at any point in the future.

SJW Rant All Bluster And No Substance

John DiLillo writes an irrational and uneducated rant entitled, In My Tisch Opinion: ‘The Last Jedi’ Isn’t a Mess, It’s a Masterpiece.


Another masterpiece for John to admire.

In it he writes:

Here are 10 different ways we were blessed by Rian Johnson.

Yeah, you’re not easily sucked into the cult of personality or anything.

If you’re on the Internet, you’ve heard people complain about The Last Jedi.

You’ve probably heard people complain about The Last Jedi if you’re not on the internet too.

The backlash has been inescapably obtuse, with people nitpicking just about every angle of the production and screeching “Star Wars is ruined!”

What backlash?  Lucasfilm reps and your contemporaries keep telling everyone that the backlash doesn’t exist.

…from the depths of their parents’ basements.

Which is exactly where you’ll be heading immediately after graduation.

And that’s too bad, because The Last Jedi is a legitimate masterpiece and the first movie to truly deserve the Star Wars mantle since the original trilogy.

I’m willing to entertain your arguments.

The majority of knocks against it come from a place of bad faith or from people who just plain didn’t pay attention.

We shall see.

In honor of its home video release, we decided to break down all of the dumbest and most unreasonable complaints about the best Star Wars movie since The Empire Strikes Back.

Let’s do this thing.

Feel free to @ us, because it means we’ve won.

According to whom?

1. “This movie is for kids!”

Worst thing about modern fandom is the delusion that things you liked as a child should stop appealing to kids now that you’re no longer one

Um. Yeah. Star Wars is for kids. Remember how the original Star Wars has a garbage can robot who makes a sad noise and falls over? Remember how you loved that when you were a kid? Well, now you’re just going to have to suck it up and try to appreciate the cute puffin aliens, because Star Wars isn’t going to suddenly become R-rated and abandon jokes just because you turned 40 and went through a crushing divorce.  But I do recommend that you watch Logan’s Run at some point.

This of course is incorrect.  The Original Trilogy was actually an all ages affair.  That’s why those who saw it as a child, continued to watch the Original Trilogy repeatedly throughout adulthood, and continue to do so.  It’s also why parents were willing to take their children to these movies in great measure; there were deeper layers of the onion for the adults too.  In fact, that’s the only real reason that Disney saw the franchise as still viable 40 years after its inception.  And let’s face it, dismembered limbs in bar fights and the smoldering corpses of Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru don’t exactly scream little kids movie.  You should try watching the movie some time, you might like it.

Nobody is expecting Star Wars to become R-Rated, or abandon jokes altogether.  However, jokes that actually work would be nice, as would compelling characters and a coherent plot.  I’m not sure that turning 40 or going through a crushing divorce has anything to do with any of that.  But I do recommend that you watch Logan’s Run.

The Sequel Trilogy might be said to be kid’s movies, since that’s the mentality of the people who are writing them.

2. “Bombs shouldn’t fall in space!”

Guys, this is going to hurt, Star Wars isn’t real. It’s not sci-fi. It’s not reality. It’s pure fantasy. Bombs shouldn’t fall in space? Sure. You know what else shouldn’t happen in space? Loud laser gun sound effects. But fine, as long as we’re doing this: An object in motion will remain in motion, so bombs falling out of a spaceship would continue to fall, and also TIE bombers already existed in the original trilogy, so please continue to talk about how this movie ruined Star Wars “science.”

Even in fantasy worlds such as Star Wars, the author(s) have to abide by rules of the world that they are creating, otherwise it becomes farce.  Surely you’ve had creative writing classes that have gone over this.  Otherwise, why not have Micky Mouse fight alongside Rey and Poe?  They’re all part of the Disney family after all.  Things have to be depicted within reasonable realism in the Star Wars setting, otherwise suspension of disbelief is shattered.  Take Kal-Leia for instance.  You’re far to young to remember this, but at the time the original 1977 Star Wars film was actually considered a gritty take on the old adventure serials from the 30s and 40s.

3. Leia’s space flight

Yes, the visual of Princess Leia soaring through space wreckage and back into her capital ship is a little goofy. It’s also totally fucking badass. It’s the best possible way for the character to escape death and a terrific way of demonstrating her latent Force powers.

The surreal and beautiful image of the late Carrie Fisher finally getting to use the Force in a movie is great. If you don’t think so, you’re wrong, and you’re even more wrong if you’re one of those people who thinks the movie should have used this moment to kill Leia and write in Fisher’s untimely passing. And cut out every other perfect scene Fisher had, including her reunion with Mark Hamill?! Go sit in the corner.

It’s a deeply stupid way to escape death and a moronic way of demonstrating latent Force Powers.  I’ve written about it at length here.

4. Admiral Holdo and Poe

I’m not one to assume the motives of anyone who didn’t like a space movie, but it seems to me that the female aspects of The Last Jedi are pretty over-represented in criticisms of the film. Strange! I’m sure that doesn’t mean anything at all.

The female aspects of The Last Jedi are not over-represented in criticisms of the film, pretty or otherwise.  Rather, what the criticisms represent instead, are criticisms of silly militant feminism in the film.  Remember, feminist ideology and the female gender are two separate things in the 21st Century, thanks to male progressives who now claim to be feminists.  So criticism of feminism does not automatically translate into criticism of women in the modern era, as much as you may want it to.

One of those female aspects is the presence of Holdo, Laura Dern’s purple-haired admiral who assumes control of the Resistance while Leia is recovering from her exposure to space. People really don’t like that the woman in charge doesn’t tell her young, hot-headed subordinate her secret plan.

Do they not like Holdo because she doesn’t inform her subordinates of her plan as a commander should, or do they not like her because her decisions lead all but a dozen or so Resistance fighters directly to their deaths?

In case you haven’t noticed, Poe Dameron is kind of a dick. All that Holdo knows about him is that he’s just been demoted for putting Resistance ships in danger in service of a reckless plan that wasn’t approved by his last female superior. So she keeps something from him, which is her right. 

How is keeping the Resistance’s plans from Poe her right?  Are you sure that you understand what a right actually is?  So what if Poe is a dick?  Since when was being a dick grounds for withholding military intel from the troops who need it in order to coordinate their actions?  Doing so for such a reason is small minded and petty.  And probably feminist.

And then Poe goes off and puts Resistance ships in danger in service of another reckless plan that wasn’t approved by his female superior. So, Holdo is proven correct. Poe is a cocky little shit who would have screwed it up, and then went and screwed it up anyway. The end.

A scenario that would happen only in the imaginations of feminists.

5. Canto Bight

This is one of the few Last Jedi criticisms that I think is understandable. Look, I love the wacky casino planet that Finn and Rose visit midway through The Last Jedi. It’s funny, well-realized and incredibly Star Wars. If you find the setting off-putting and you just don’t vibe with it, that’s cool. What you can’t do is claim that the scene in question is “pointless” because that just isn’t true. Leia and Han’s sojourn on the Millennium Falcon in Empire doesn’t end up impacting the plot, but it changes the characters for good and Canto Bight is the same. What Finn learns on Canto Bight is to care about something bigger than his friends. He learns about systematic injustice in the galaxy and sees the impact of the Resistance beyond the small group he’s familiar with. It all builds to him abandoning his complacency and embracing his identity as a rebel. That matters to the movie, whether or not you liked how it went down. Also come on, BB-8 shoots coins at a guy!

Of course it’s true that the Canto Bight sequence is pointless.  It serves only to facilitate moronic social justice lecturing that has no value whatsoever.  Comparing it with the Han and Leia sojourn in TESB is ridiculous.  The sequence in TESB certainly impacts the plot because torturing Han is what allowed Darth Vader to send out Force vibes to Luke, who then saw his friends in pain in a vision on Dagobah, and then flew to Cloud City to save them.

6. Rose

I’m not going to claim that everyone who hates Kelly Marie Tran’s delightful character is racist or sexist, although I know for a fact that some of them are. I’m going to go a step further and say that they’re also heartless. Rose is the character who comes the closest to being the soul of The Last Jedi. She’s achingly sincere, a bottomless pit of kindness. People don’t like sincerity in their blockbusters; they want quips and snark and Deadpool. 

How is it exactly that you know for a fact that people who hate the moronic Rose Tico character are racist or sexist?  Are you sure that you don’t just call everything racist and sexist?

When someone like Rose shows up, modern audiences squirm and reject her because a line as corny as “That’s how we’ll win: Not fighting what we hate, saving what we love” just has to be bad, right? Nope. It’s the perfect summation of the film as a whole. 

Well then how come Holdo got to destroy what she hated?

Long live Rose Tico.

Tee hee…

7. Rey

People have been complaining since The Force Awakens that Rey is a “Mary Sue,” which is a subtle code that Internet sexists have for whining about girls taking over the world.

Is it super duper secret code for being sexist?  Or is it that Rey is in fact a Mary Sue? Occam’s Razor my friend.

The accusation here is that Rey is just too perfect and good at everything, which on the surface seems pretty absurd given that she spends the entire runtime of The Force Awakens struggling with her biggest flaw, her desire to avoid her destiny and wait around for her family to come back for her. She overcomes that weakness here, realizing throughout the course of the film that she’s the only one who can discover her place in the galaxy. No one can show it to her.

Didn’t you hear from Daisy Ridley herself?  Not only is Rey not a Mary Sue, but she also has no weaknesses.  Reconcile that one.

That ties in with another complaint about Rey, the fact that no one’s moronic “Who are Rey’s parents?” fan theories came true. Rey was never going to be Obi-Wan Kenobi’s grandniece or whatever, because it’s very obvious that the arc of this Star Wars trilogy is the conflict between Ben Solo, someone who feels entitled to a legacy, and Rey Nobody, someone who has a legacy thrust upon her. Sorry Rey isn’t a clone of Emperor Palpatine. (This is a real thing that real stupid people wanted.)

Ha!  The novelization of The Last Jedi suggests that Rey is Luke’s niece.  What are you going to do when JJ Abrams retcons the “nobody” parentage in Episode IX?

8. Killing Snoke

Okay look, I’m just going to cut to the chase. No one gives a shit about Snoke. Snoke sucks. Snoke is a boring Emperor Palpatine rip-off who looks like a pile of moldy dicks. Anyone who cared about a character named “Snoke” should be ashamed of themselves. He’s boring and stupid, and killing him is one of the best choices The Last Jedi makes. Kylo Ren is infinitely more compelling and will be a far better villain, and no amount of “Snoke=Mace Windu?!?!” YouTube videos will change that fact.

Should people who care about a character named Snoke be more ashamed than someone who knows what a pile of moldy dicks looks like?

9. Luke’s characterization

This is the big one. People are very angry that this movie wasn’t about a perfect Jedi god named Luke Skywalker who gets all of the ladies and kills all the bad guys dead. Luke isn’t perfect here; he’s bitter and sad, and he doesn’t have all the answers. But a still-growing Luke is far more interesting than the charmingly stagnant Han Solo mannequin that appeared in The Force Awakens. Luke changes. He grows. And yes, he dies. That’s upsetting! But it’s okay for a movie to upset you. Sometimes it’s trying to. With some distance, there’s nothing more satisfying than the death Luke gets in The Last Jedi, a death that’s noble and powerful and incredibly cool. Luke couldn’t be the star of these movies. These Star Wars movies are about the next generation inheriting a legacy, not the last generation holding onto it. It’s no wonder middle-aged fanboys are upset. These movies don’t belong to you anymore, guys. 

Absolutely no one said that they are angry that this movie wasn’t about a perfect Jedi god named Luke Skywalker who gets all of the ladies and kills all the bad guys dead.  No one.  So you’re responding to a point that no one made, simply because you think the prose in that sentence sounds clever.  It’s not.

Dying wasn’t the upsetting part.  It was the manner in which he died.  There’s nothing wrong with the idea of Luke Skywalker dying.  It’s the execution of that idea which was a steaming pile of Bantha fodder.  It was all very, very lame indeed.

Time to let go.

The box office and the waning toy and merchandise sales demonstrate that many are letting go.

Luke couldn’t be the star of these movies. These Star Wars movies are about the next generation inheriting a legacy, not the last generation holding onto it.

Well, he could, but few really wanted that.  What some were expecting instead, was for Luke to play the Obi-Wan of this trilogy.  Obi-Wan in the Original Trilogy was a secondary character.  Again, you’re arguing against points that no one is making.

10. Killing Admiral Ackbar

Oh, you guys care about Admiral Ackbar now? What the fuck is wrong with you? He’s just a fish man who said one funny thing once. Why are you angry that he’s dead? You’re lucky they even remembered to put him in these movies. Did you know that in the old dumb Star Wars books Admiral Ackbar just literally dies of old age? Look it up. You should feel lucky your fish man hero died in battle!

Admiral Ackbar led the assault on the Death Star 2.0.  Sure his time was brief.  Nevertheless, he still holds far more emotional gravitas than Holdo ever did, or could.

Also, get a life.

Says the guy who took the time to write this silly article.

Star Peace

I previously discussed the controversy over the removal of the blasters from the International Solo posters.  I also discussed Disney’s purported response to the removal, and how it conflicted with the known political climate in Brazil over the public debate on firearms.  I explained how it didn’t matter if the posters were international, since the political motivation for removing the blasters was the same despite being designed for Brazil.  I then repeated that explanation in response to Star Wars Explained’s inappropriate admonishment of Jeremy at Geeks + Gamers.


Now Jeremy has discovered the same altered blasterless character images, now being used for American character posters.

If you still doubt that there is a political agenda at work here, read the following sentence from the new Han Solo novel Last Shot, which describes what happened when Han Solo brought a toy blaster home for a young Kylo Ren to play with:

He brought Ben a play blaster from Burundang and he was encouraging his violent side;

Pretty soon, every commanding officer in the Resistance will be some sort of space hippie like Holdo.


Just a point of clarification here.

Jeremy is not speaking about the British Solo posters, which were released on the Star Wars UK Twitter feed, all of which sport blasters:


Rather what Jeremy is referring to instead, are the new blasterless character posters for the United States:

If you’ll recall, Disney purported responded to ScreenRant, specifically stating that, “First of all, the posters arent for the United States. They’re posters for Brazil.”

And yet, here are the very same blasterless images now in the United States poster. Compare and contrast:

Maybe Disney is trolling us.


SJW Attempts To Shame Normal Person

Remember Neil Harrington?  He’s the wise sage from dorksideoftheforce.com who called for everyone in fandom to just get along.

What’s he doing now?  Well, he’s now got a new piece up at fansided entitled, Crybaby Star Wars fan’s boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story due to ‘feminazi agenda’ of Star Wars.


Gee, I never read anyone refer to Backlashers as crybabies before.  How original.

In his article Neil comments on a very well articulated YouTube video which can be seen here:

Neil stupidly writes:

A crybaby, Star Wars fan is boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story for all the wrong reasons, proving once again how out of touch with reality some people genuinely are.

Let’s get something straight here.  SJWs are wholly unqualified to comment on the nature of reality.  This of course is because their modern ideology originally stumbled out of the LSD-laden piss holes of Woodstock back in the late 1960s.  So their entire ideology is founded on distortion of reality.  But Neil continues anyway.

Solo: A Star Wars Story is nearly a month away, and many Star Wars fans are excited about another film within a galaxy far, far away. Others, not so much — and that’s okay.

As long as they’re not interested in it for reasons that you approve of apparently.

Meanwhile, a Star Wars “YouTuber” is not happy with the direction of what he has termed “Disney’s Star Wars,” making a “look at me” video in response.

“Look at me” is the whole point of the video format.  It’s a visual medium at which people look.

Before I get started, I want to make something (kyber) crystal clear.

Self-appointed authority and massive stupidity always walks hand in hand.  It’s a universal constant.  How’s that for crystal clarity?

It’s perfectly acceptable to not like all of the Star Wars content. That’s not the point of this response, not in the slightest. It’s the reasonings and entitlement of some Star Wars fans, like this guy, that’s garnered this response.

So it’s perfectly acceptable to not like all of the Star Wars content, as long as people don’t like the content for reasonings that you approve of.  Got it.  Who exactly appointed you to make this determination for everyone else?

Honestly, the only people that I’ve seen express entitlement, are the SJWs who have been screaming their moronic demands for equal representation and gender equality to Disney ever since George Lucas sold his company.  Normal people were always perfectly fine with accepting whatever stories that George Lucas wanted to tell in whatever form they took, warts and all.

Also, his hateful remarks about women really got my Midichlorians boiling.

His hateful remarks about women are a figment of your imagination.  He never made any such “hateful” remarks.

Though, I have to admit, I’d be interested to see what happens to your blood boiling point when you read one of my “Vagi-Chlorian” comments.

Also, this particular fanboy is making all sorts of claims against Disney and its direction which are flat out wrong.

Actually, it’s your own comments that are flat out wrong.  And I’m happy to correct you.

Right off the bat, the camera angles and long, dramatic shots of Gabriel (the creator of this video) walking languidly up and down bleachers show what this video is really about. It’s about him. It’s not about presenting a topic of conversation or facilitating a civil debate. He wants us to look at him and, Gabriel, you’ve got your wish.

Well yeah.  He’s about to express his opinion.  So it is about him, and how he feels towards the Star Wars franchise.  What exactly is wrong with that?   I mean, besides nothing whatsoever.

“Never thought I’d say this, but I’m boycotting Solo: A Star Wars Story. The only way to get Star Wars back to where it was, is to simply say. No.”

Cool, bro. You don’t have to see it. No one is “Forcing” you to do so.

He never claimed that anyone was forcing him to see the film.  So why would you respond to a comment that he never made?

“Disney continues to shove down their SJW feminazi agenda down our retinas.” 

You mean creating characters, such as Daisy Ridley’s Rey, meant to empower women is a bad thing? Women holding an equal place within the Star Wars universe is bad? I don’t know where you get your delusions, laser brain.

Well no.  He doesn’t mean that creating characters, such as Mary Sue Rey, meant to empower women is a bad thing.  That’s why the sentence that he actually spoke doesn’t contain those words in that order.  He also didn’t say that holding an equal place within the Star Wars universe is bad either.  That also is a fabrication of your own making.  So the reason that you don’t understand where he gets his “delusions,” is that you’re consistently responding to points that he’s not making.

Rather, what he did say instead, was that, “Disney continues to shove down their SJW feminazi agenda down our retinas.”  Pay particular note to how the sentence that you wrote, and the sentence that he spoke, contain different words.  This of course means that the two sentences contain different meanings and intent.

It’s always important to respond to what people actually say and write, rather than to respond to what you wish they had said and written, just because you have some well-rehearsed pre-fabricated counterpoint to recite.

Why would he even make such a comment when women have had an equal place in Star Wars from the very beginning, for 40 years now?

The real problem as I see it is that women, or more accurately feminists, are more equal than others in the current state of the franchise.  A great reason to abandon it for something else that SJWs will barnacle to in 40 years.

Gabriel even claims that he’s not sexist.

Um, yes you are. News flash: if you use the term “feminazi” you’re a sexist.

Um, no.  He isn’t.  News Flash: feminist ideology and the female gender are no longer inextricably linked in the 21st Century.  This of course is thanks to male progressives who now claim to be feminists.  So criticism of the pure idiocy of modern feminist ideology does not automatically translate into criticism of women.

The recent trend of inclusion within a galaxy far, far away is a necessity (true there is still room for improvement, but they’re moving in the right direction) and kudos to Kathleen Kennedy for embracing it. Speaking of which, he lets the President of Lucasfilm have it.

Recent trend?  Where have you uneducated SJWs been for the last 40 yearsAre you even remotely aware that it’s 2018, and not 1968?

He goes on to complain that Rey is powerful “without any training,” and that any character can now be powerful for no reason. You mean like Anakin Skywalker, who is mysteriously created by the Force?

Well no.  Anakin had a strong connection with the Force.  But he still received training from Obi-Wan.  That was the whole point of the Prequel Trilogy.  Anakin was Obi-Wan’s apprentice.  Have you watched the films?

A nobody, like Rey?

Ha!  Aren’t you going to be surprised when JJ Abrams retcons that in Episode IX and makes Rey Luke’s niece.

Or, Luke Skywalker, who was able to blow up the Death Star with five minutes of training with an aging Jedi?

Well that’s a pretty stupid argument.  Luke’s ability to blow up the Death Star had little to do with Jedi training.

Luke flew his T-16 back home on Tatooine through Beggar’s Canyon in which he shot womp rats which were about as big as the exhaust port on the Death Star.  That effectively acted as a real world simulation of the Death Star Run.  This was all stated by Luke during the presentation to the pilots showing them how to attack the Death Star.  Obi-Wan’s voice guided him through at the end, but primarily to encourage Luke to believe in his own abilities and experience.

Again, have you watched the films?

If you’re going to criticize Rey, then you have to slam the Skywalkers, too.

No, you don’t.  Not if you’ve actually watched all the films.

When we first meet Luke, he’s a naive inexperienced farm boy, who complains about wanting to hang out with friends, gets scolded by his Uncle, gets knocked unconscious by a Tusken Raider, gets pushed down in a bar by a drunkard, has to be defended by an elderly Jedi, gets insulted and his hand slapped by Han, gets insulted by Leia, gets mauled by a Wampa, gets shot down in his snowspeeder by an AT-AT, crash lands on a swamp planet, and gets his hand cut off during his very first lightsaber duel.

Not Rey though. She gets to skip the first phase of the hero’s journey so hear her roar! Somehow, she can pilot the Millennium Falcon and use a lightsaber all without any training at all. Sure she fumbles a bit getting the Falcon off the ground, but in only a couple of minutes, she’s evading Tie Fighters and deftly flying through the tight spaces of wrecked Star Destroyers. Not only is she Han Solo, but she’s Luke Skywalker too! Effectively fighting off a trained Knight of Ren, whatever that is, in her very first lightsaber battle. But don’t you dare question her girl power you misogynist, even though it doesn’t leave much left for Finn to shine with.

If your only criticisms are leveled at the female characters who receive the exact same character development as the male characters…that’s sexist.

They didn’t receive the exact same character development.  Watching the films makes this self evident.

He even claims Disney delayed the novel and Blu-ray release due to “plot holes” in The Last Jedi. Really, now? How did you get that insider information, Gabriel?

Reading the novels and comics is insider information now?  Anyone who can rub two brain cells together can see from the released material in novels and comics that they are being used to plug up what some call plot holes.  It’s transparent.

Don’t present opinion and conjecture as fact.

See the above linked facts.

The plans for both releases were well known before The Last Jedi premiered (we even wrote up an article on it); and before the complaints of some fans.

Great.  That doesn’t change the nature of the actual material within those releases.

Of course, Disney wants to make money. They only forked out $4 billion to buy the franchise. That does not mean that they aren’t committed to producing high-quality films or that they don’t care about the franchise whatsoever. If you don’t like the material, don’t buy it. You’re a real hero for doing your small part to take down Disney!

Well, that’s the real trick, isn’t it?  But let’s be perfectly honest here.  What you’re doing is attempting to shame this man into financially supporting a political agenda you approve of, and at the same time trying to discourage others from following in his footsteps.  You’re doing this, because you’re painfully aware that there aren’t enough of you SJW dimwits to financially support the franchise yourselves.

But, Gabriel’s complaint that Ehrenreich doesn’t sound or look anything like Harrison Ford, thus making him unworthy of being Han Solo, is ridiculous.

Far from being ridiculous, convincing the audience that Alden is Han Solo is the biggest challenge this film has.  One that could have been easily overcome by simply casting the right man.

Ron Howard has been very clear that he wasn’t looking for Ehrenreich to give his imitation of Ford, but present us with his own take on the character. He doesn’t have to sound or look exactly like Ford — Ehreinech needs to embrace his inner scoundrel.

Sure, Ron Howard has been very clear on that.  But it doesn’t matter if Ron Howard has been very clear on that.  What matters in the end, is how the audience perceives the work.

Last and certainly not least. The “boycott” on Solo: A Star Wars Story isn’t actually a boycott. Gabriel says that he might see it once it comes on Blu-ray DVD. So, how is that a boycott (you keep using that word but I don’t think it means what you think it means)? Your 11-minute video, Gabriel, has more plot holes than any movie you complained about.

The non-boycott “boycott” is proof that this Star Wars fanboy is out of touch with reality and displays, in a nutshell, all that’s wrong within the fanbase of a galaxy far, far away.

He’s not going to see it theatrically.  That’s a theatrical boycott.  So you shouldn’t be lecturing others about the definitions of words, when you yourself don’t understand the ones that you’re typing out.

Heck, it’s clear that you haven’t even watched the films, so you really shouldn’t be commenting on them very much at all.

But here’s the bottom line:

Normal people don’t organize boycotts in the same frenzied manner that SJW savages do.  Sure occasionally a few of the normals try to start a boycott when they’re passionate about something.  But generally speaking, normal people will simply shrug their shoulders, and walk away from the franchise.  No organizing will be necessary.  SJW politics will do all the heavy lifting in pushing normal people away from the franchise.

In fact, the box office and the waning merchandise and toy sales demonstrate that this has already begun.


The talented filmmaker who created Gabriel’s video has posted his own response to Neil Harrington’s dorksideoftheforce.com article:


The brilliant Ethan Van Sciver just took Harrington’s article on:


Gabriel provides a follow up video:


Jeremy from Geeks + Gamers adds his own commentary:

The Social Justice Repulsion Effect Takes Hold Of The Star Wars Franchise

SJW politics naturally destroys any cultural institution that it infects.  SJW ideology is quite literally a cultural cancer; a fact that is easily demonstrated.

We’ve seen that truth expressed in the lowest rated televised Oscars in history.  We’ve seen it in the waning sales of Marvel Comics, and the subsequent replacement of Marvel’s SJW Editor in Chief as a result.  We’ve seen it in the slide of NFL viewership, and the MLB replacing the NFL as America’s most popular sportWe’ve seen it in the decline of Sports Illustrated subscriptions.  We’ve seen it in the declining ratings of ESPN, which had to fire 100 employees as a result.  We’ve seen it in the plummeting ratings of Late Night talk shows which have taken to lecturing their audience rather than entertaining or enlightening them.  We’ve seen it in declining Box Office at the cinema which has also increasingly chosen to lecture its audience with deeply ignorant SJW politics.  Anyone who doubts that people in the American entertainment industry are political activists rather than artists, can read about how Hollywood screenwriters are now coaching progressive political candidates.  We’ve seen it in SJW controlled universities and colleges which are experiencing big drops in enrollment.  We’ve seen it in East Berliners risking their lives to cross the infamous Berlin Wall in an attempt to escape East Berlin.  We’ve seen it in the SJW controlled city of Detroit, from which so many people have fled that their downtown skyscrapers are abandoned.  We’ve seen it in the blue state of California, from which the middle class is fleeing.  We’ve seen it in nations like Venezuela where thousands of formerly well-to-do people are fleeing the disastrous effects of the nation’s newly formed leftist SJW government.

Wherever SJW politics are imposed, normal people will understandably flee.  It’s a universal constant both in the micro and in the macro.

And this isn’t just anecdotal hyperbole.  Matt Philbin from NewsBusters.org reports:

According to new data from a McLaughlin & Associates/Media Research Center national poll of 1,000 likely voters:

75% agree with the statement, “When I watch live sports or entertainment shows on television I am trying to get away from politics and do not want to be bombarded with partisan political messages.”

Given that normal people also sought to escape the same kinds of worthless cultural re-education in Soviet gulags, this should come as no surprise.

Since the SJW contagion has now metastasized within Lucasfilm, we can fully expect to see what I call the Social Justice Repulsion Effect happen with the Star Wars franchise as well.  In fact, it has already begun.

Martin Daubney of The Telegraph writes in an editorial entitled, Liberal identity politics has ruined Star Wars for the fanboys:

Has the peculiarly Earthling curse of liberal identity politics infected even galaxies far, far away? It would appear so, if a growing fanboy backlash to Star Wars: The Last Jedi is to be believed.

Since its release at the weekend, a remarkable gulf has emerged between professional critics and the general viewing public’s scoring of the movie – as illustrated by that modern barometer of movies, Rotten Tomatoes. On the review aggregation site, the professionals give the movie an impressive average score of 93pc; while fans score it a more Luke-warm 55pc.

What’s going on? It appears this huge discrepancy can be attributed not to its plot – described as “having more holes than a Swiss cheese that shared a wedding bed with a porcupine” – but a claim the movie is no more than “social justice warrior propaganda”.

In media land, one critic gushed The Last Jedi is “the most triumphantly feminist Star Wars movie yet,” concluding it a masterpiece that possesses a “celebratory inclusiveness that seems entirely in the Jedi spirit”.

The Last Jedi has also been heralded as the first Star Wars movie that passes the Bechdel Test, a rule of thumb that asks whether a work of fiction features at least two women who talk to each other about something other than a man.

This type of analysis isn’t new. Entire books have been written on the identity politics of Star Wars, pointing out that creator George Lucas once spoke of his duty to wield a “moral megaphone” in his filmmaking. “Somebody has to tell young people what we think is a good person,” he said.

However, some feel that, since Disney bought the rights to the Star Wars franchise, this moral megaphone has become deafening.

Analysis of user comments on Rotten Tomatoes is telling. While most lasers are locked on the flick’s “terrible plot holes”, its “un forgivable” treatment of Luke Skywalker, and it being “little more than a very long Disney advert vehicle to sell merchandise,” a large voice of dissent decries its use of identity politics as a serious Force of disgruntlement.

The comments are littered with one-star reviews that read, “Politically correct to the point of boredom”; “SJW propaganda” and “I’m frustrated that feminism and diversity have made their way into this film. This has ruined Star Wars for me as well as my kids. Keep liberalism out of it and stop ruining once good things”.

Certainly, watching the movie can feel like you’re playing identity politics bingo.

Perhaps these fanboys ought to get over themselves. It’s just a movie, after all.

But the truth is that identity politics is the kryptonite that saps the joy out of all it touches. How long before Harrison Ford comes out as Trans Solo? What price a zero-emissions Millennium Falcon? Will Jabba The Hutt be called out for “fat shaming” the obese?

Will any of this make the slightest difference one of the highest-grossing movie franchise of all time? Only time will tell, but for now a social media war is raging between critics and diehard fans, an increasing number of whom seem to be saying “dead to me, the franchise is”.

The truly amusing part of this whole biofeedback machine, is that the SJWs currently staffed within Lucasfilm will see the backlash as a great success.  SJWs will delude themselves into thinking that they’re pissing off all the right people.  Who are all the right people?  I have compiled the unabridged SJW gripe list and provide it here for your convenience:

“Deplorable rich intolerant bitter clinging hate-mongering war-mongering fear-mongering privileged middle-class micro-aggressing triggering patriarchal straight sexist misogynist cisgendered hetero-normative transphobic homophobic homogeneous hegemonic racist xenophobic jingoistic nativist tea-bagging redneck hillbilly reptilian-brained binary-thinking white supremacist euro-centric male Zionist Evangelical Christian Far-Right Extreme-Right Uber-Right Ultra-Right Alt-Right NeoCon so-called conservative Republican bourgeoisie capitalist colonialist imperialist fascists.”

Of course, none of that makes any kind of coherent sense, but that’s the inherent nature of the uneducated SJW mentality that normal people have to cope with.  They’re pre-programmed to involuntarily squawk these words in response to various stimuli without regard to what the words actually mean.  In any case, the above list represents how the SJW employees at Lucasfilm view every backlasher who writes a letter, posts a blog, or uploads a video in protest to their content.  Just ask them.  They’ll tell you, if they can bear to acknowledge your existence at all.  So they’re almost guaranteed to double down on social justice messaging.

Jack Kenrick from squawker.org also identifies this phenomenon in an article entitled, Star Wars Fans Seem To Hate The Last Jedi And SJW’s Couldn’t Be Happier About It.  In it he writes:

What’s been interesting to watch in the hours since its release, is that the general public seems to be finding this the most divisive Star Wars film yet. While almost universally lauded by professional pop culture and film critics alike. The Last Jedi is seemingly not doing quite as well with the average American moviegoer. A fact many Progressive types somehow seem to be actively celebrating as proof of their own moral superiority.

Case in point this article written for Wired magazine entitled, “The Last Jedi Will Bother Some People. Good.” In which writer Angela Watercutter not so subtly informs us all that “The movie isn’t here to Make the Galaxy Great Again.” We are are told that those who don’t like “diversity” should not see the film. Of course as is now standard practice for today’s modern liberals, by diversity they don’t mean a variety of thought but rather simply superficial differences in skin color. None of this is too surprising however when you consider the original title of the now modified story was actually, “The Last Jedi Will Be To Inclusive for Some People. Good.”

It would seem that the average moviegoer doesn’t appreciate an obviously politicized half hours worth of pointless subplot. Which is frustratingly what the film provides, as almost the entirety of the genuinely forced “Progressive” parts of the movie take place in an oddly out of place subplot, that ultimately feels like it lacks any real purpose beyond simply pleasing SJW types. 


Immediately upon publishing this blog post, I discovered that SC Reviews was discussing another article that echoes many of the same things I’ve been writing about on this blog.  Paul Cheung writes an article at fee.org entitled, “The Last Jedi” and the Politicization of Storytelling.  In it, he writes:

Has identity politics created a dilemma for the Disney Empire?

There’s been a disturbance in the franchise: Ambivalence, rather than anticipation, has characterized the online response to Disney’s announcement of the deluge of new Star Wars projects we are to be saturated with over the next several years. And while the trailer for Solo: A Star Wars Story (scheduled for May) was expected to be received with some misgiving, many fans are actively rooting for it to flop.

There’s already an over-abundance of online rants analyzing The Last Jedi’s shortcomings as a piece of entertainment. But it is in the realm of the ideas where the division between critics and audiences is most stark. Dozens of articles praise the film’s perceived socio-political commentary while countless viewers decry it for the very same reason.

One reason is that archetypes and the mythic storytelling form never lose relevance. They are timeless and universal. By contrast, loading a film with political messaging for 2018, using it as a vessel to comment on current events, makes its relevance transient. Ironically, Johnson’s attempt to “update” the saga is precisely what caused his entry to feel dated at an accelerated pace.

And it isn’t just the film’s detractors who observe the current American political climate’s bearing on the way it was written. GQ UK gleefully claims “The Last Jedi takes on Trump”. Other articles, such as these in The Independent, The Guardian, and Wired, insinuate that anyone not on board is an “alt-right” hater of diversity.

While the controversy may appear to be an inordinate fuss over “light entertainment,” Star Wars (whether by chance or intention) has come to represent something far more significant than that.

Throughout history, stories have functioned as one of the most effective societal-shaping tools. The themes, ideals, and values communicated in stories have simultaneously reflected and molded the cultures which produced them. This is what Victor Hugo was alluding to when he wrote, “England has two books: the Bible and Shakespeare. England made Shakespeare, but the Bible made England.”

Descriptions of Star Wars as “generation-defining” are also allusions to the power of stories to shape who we are. And therein lies the problem: Johnson’s work, while managing to imitate the aesthetic of Star Wars (stormtroopers, lightsabers, etc.) is a hollow husk bearing only surface similarity to its parent material. Its shallow identity politics reflect a cultural hegemony adrift from deeper moorings.

Such an incoherent set of half-baked ideas wouldn’t matter if not for the fact that they are being propagated on an industrial scale, becoming almost ubiquitous in U.S. and UK entertainment.

In a scene in The Last Jedi which practically invites the type of historical parallelism above, there’s an attempted book-burning (ignited by Yoda, no less) broadcasting the film’s overarching theme of abandoning the past.

“Let the past die. Kill it if you have to,” Kylo urges Rey, even as Johnson urges the audience to “let the past die” so that we can embrace his Star Wars and, at a broader cultural level, the ideas his film promulgates.

With the backlash to The Last Jedi, the values in the background of Johnson’s film have been inadvertently thrust into the spotlight, exposing greater popular discomfort with them than anyone anticipated.


SC Reviews offers his own perspective on the Telegraph article:

Great Movies Let Us Down

The mental gymnastics being performed to apologize for the steaming pile of social justice propaganda that is The Last Jedi are absolutely amazing.

Jason Burke from fansided.com tells us that Rian’s movie was great because it showed us how everything we liked about the franchise really just sucked in an article entitled, Star Wars: The Last Jedi is the ultimate letdown movie and that’s why it’s so great.


The greatest movie of all time.

In it he writes:

Tasked with the impossible expectation of repairing, rebooting and continuing the most beloved franchise in modern history, J.J. Abrams didn’t shirk away from his responsibilities. 

The franchise wasn’t in need of repair.  It was trucking along just fine with The Clone Wars and was already preparing to produce the Sequel Trilogy before its sale to Disney.

So careful in his execution to get “that” feel of the classics, once discarded by George Lucas quicker than Anakin’s limbs tumbling into a molten lava river, that his new version of our heroes and their adventures bordered on plagiarism.

Wow.  So SJWs have fallen in love with Rian Johnson’s propagandist subversion so much, that they’re now turning on JJ Abrams.  JJ certainly has his work cut out for him in Episode IX.

Whatever you think, it worked.

No.  It didn’t.

Disney could give you 2.068 billion little green pieces why they would agree.

Well sure, but they cooked the Golden Goose.

Accepting The Force Awakens for what it was on the surface, a reboot/sequel akin to A New Hope, maybe on some subconscious level, we all were hoping for The Empire Strikes Back Redux. We didn’t get that movie.

No kidding.  Tell that to all the people dredging up old criticism of The Empire Strikes Back in an attempt to liken the two.

Rian Johnson’s script made sure to crap all over whatever Abrams tried to recapture and your childhood at the same time. 

Gee, thanks Rian Johnson.

 He made sure to show you that the Force was more than mind tricks and moving rocks, a la, Leia morphing into a crystalline Star-Lord in the dark chasm of space before performing her best Mary Poppins impersonation.

Which is why the Force is now gobbledygook, as Lucas feared it would become.

He made sure to show you that allegiance is just a strange synonym for whoever gets you through the moment as DJ (Lando-lite played by Benicio Del Toro) plays both sides only to live and get paid — means to an end.

Kind of like the allegiance of fans to a franchise…

And, that legends are just propped up myths, flawed and human and still prone to making the same mistakes that beset them on this journey.

And just think, if fans had only come to that realization 40 years ago, they never would have bothered with the Star Wars franchise to begin with.  Fans could have saved themselves a whole lot of money over the decades.

The Last Jedi is a beautiful letdown

The Last Jedi is a complete letdown and beautiful one at that. 

Is a beautiful letdown anything like a grotesque uplifting?

Written from the perspective of a man who walked into Kathleen Kennedy’s office and said, “You know, the script seemed to take off about halfway through when I dropped enough acid to kill an actual Wookie.” And, she said, “Ok, great!”

That actually makes some sense.

We were expected to get answers to questions like: What is Rey’s mysterious lineage?  How did Snoke manage to corrupt Ben Solo and create The First Order?

How did Rey become so flawless in everything she does?

Who cares, he said.

Many of the fans are saying that now.

“Well, where were the Knights of Ren we’ve waited to see? Where was the ultimate lightsaber showdown that has become the staple of all Star Wars films? It was deeper than that.

One man’s depth is another man’s shallow.

All the characters, like Disney’s version of the franchise, are struggling to move forward.

Disney’s version of the franchise is struggling to move forward all right.  Ha!

Caught up in the cosmic ordeal of light and dark, of bloodlines and perpetual war. Stuck in an endless loop –The Jedi and the Sith have waged the same fight over and over, only the names and the combatants have changed.

Which is what kept people coming back to the franchise for 40 years.

Poe has the looks and heart of a natural leader, unrivaled as a pilot, but he wants to play the hero.

He’s also a seamstress apparently.

He shows an absolute lack of discipline and focuses when taking out a dreadnaught, another superweapon with flawed engineering, that he sacrifices an entire bomber fleet against Leia’s wishes.

To his disappointment, he loses rank with his general, but he still hasn’t learned a valuable lesson: he can’t win the war by himself, not in one moment, and not by himself. Instead of reflecting, Poe goes on a rogue and treasonous run, until finally, in the end, watching Luke, he understands that sacrifice and living another day can be the spark for the rebellion.

Yes.  Rebellions are often won by turning tail and running away.  What a fine lesson indeed.

Finn finds life outside the conflict is more gray than black and white. Rose tries to show Finn what the fight is truly about as the Star Wars galaxy’s version of the one percent on Canto Bight, the arms dealers, live lavishly, profiting from war and slavery. Even The Resistance funnels payments to them to acquire weapons for the fight. But, more than that, Finn is still trying to reconcile his place within this new life as a person and not a number before Rose shows him the things worth fighting for.

Rose Tico’s moronic social justice lectures to the audience do not apply to the real world.  The whole point of myth is to teach lessons that have applications in the real world.  They’re a way for youth to gain wisdom, without having to live through those experiences themselves.  There’s no wisdom in Rose Tico’s lectures because they don’t apply to reality.

The holy triumvirate of the force; Luke, Rey, and Kylo are essentially struggling with what has weighed us all down at one time or another: the past.

Rey finally meets Luke, a man who was revered through the galaxy as a mythical hero, a space god with a laser sword, only to find a cynical old hermit who has cut himself off from the Force altogether. Give him a bottle of Jack, some Lucky’s and the best Mark Hamill Joker voice, and he’s the perfect hobo.

He believes that the galaxy’s dysfunction stems from the hubris of the Jedi and Sith and that he was complicit in that arrogance by believing in his own legend — that he failed a boy with that mighty Skywalker blood. Through Rey’s persistence and a little help from your friendly neighborhood force ghost, Yoda, Luke realizes that the Jedi can endure as long as they evolve.

So the Jedi never really returned at all, rendering the title of Episode VI utterly meaningless.  Great.

Rey deals with the past in her way. She, like, the audience, believe there is more — that her parents must be someone. She must be a Skywalker, a Solo, Ben Kenobi’s granddaughter or the reincarnation of Anakin Skywalker (an idea I love but would never work). Sadly, unexpectedly, quite shockingly, we find out she’s nobody, and it’s brilliant.

Boy, are you SJWs going to be pissed when JJ Abrams retcons that in Episode IX by revealing to us that Kylo lied to Ren just as Ben lied to Luke about his parentage, and that Rey is really Luke’s niece as he claims in the novelization.  Or maybe it will all still be brilliant.

See, before the midi-chlorians and the Jedi temples, before the sequels and prequels and the expanded universe, Star Wars was much simpler. In some ways, it was about something more relatable, our place.  We were all Luke Skywalker. A farm boy who felt stuck with what his uncle and the universe thought he should be — gazing out amongst double sunsets with the comprised posture of someone just waiting for the opportunity to bust out of his own skin and jump on the first cruiser, laser beaming him straight off the planet.

What George Lucas accomplished is making you believe that the energy that flowed through him flowed through us all. That anyone from any walk of life, with the proper training, direction and focus could wield it while being guided by it—that we all played a part in destiny.

No.  He didn’t.  Rather, what George Lucas did accomplish instead, was showing that if you had the inner motivation and optimism and merit, you could accomplish great things.  Not everyone has those things.  So equal equality equally equalized equitably was never part of George Lucas’ message.  Rather, that’s a social justice reinterpretation, and therefore worthless.  You can see what would happen if just anyone could use the Force here.

Then came the prequels and the force became clinical, sterile in feel—just a swab of your blood and, maybe, just maybe, you could be a force wielder, too. 

This is where watching the films becomes important when commenting on them.  The Midi–Chlorians were never a stand-in for the Force.  They were microorganisms in the cells of a person’s body, that facilitated access to the Force.  The Force was still the Force. Red blood cells carry oxygen.  Red blood cells are not oxygen itself.

On some levels it would make sense that they would have a greater scientific understanding of the Force and how it operates within a person before the fall of the Republic after which much Jedi knowledge was lost.  Everyone had Midi-Chlorians.  But some had higher or lower counts of them, just as in real life the count of red blood cells varies from person to person.

While, as fantastic as The Empire Strikes Back and nearly as good Return of The Jedi were, the force took a dynastic turn.

That is part of the core of the hero with a thousand faces.  It’s why Star Wars struck such a deep chord and lasted for 40 years, and why abandoning that for the political fashion trends of the moment will kill the franchise.

But, in Rian Johnson’s Star Wars, the inclusion that Rey’s parents are, in fact, junkers and drunks who sold her for a fix, meant that someone from the meekest background could change destiny.

Luke started out as a naive farm boy.  It doesn’t get much meeker than that.  Rey goes from junker to universal expert in everything in about 5 nano-seconds.

Then, there’s Kylo Ren. Say what you want about Adam Driver and his portrayal of the unstable antagonist, which has been the joke of many YouTube videos, Twitter feeds and countless memes, but Driver, Johnson, and Abrams have crafted something in the character that the MCU and DCEU have not: a complex villain.

Driver plays the character with a ferocious intensity, his face always wears an unsure look, as if he’s ever dangerously close to falling off the edge of a cliff. He’s a villain who accepts being a monster, not because he’s sadistic and enjoys the brutality in death, but only because he believes it’s the only way forward and the only way to break from the path that Luke and Snoke set upon him.

With his helmet smashed to little black bits on the floor, Kylo has chosen to move on from Darth Vader.  But he’s still unsure. Rey can see the good in him, Snoke, the raw dark power. In familiar Star Wars fashion, he needs to rectify the two. Johnson gives him a third option, an escape; himself.

He’s like the quarterback bully with emotional issues in some WB drama for teens.

Let the past die

Kylo wants merely to obliterate the past (Kill it if you have to). Not realizing that the rage that moves him forward is rooted in the past, he’s doomed to repeat the sick cycle until his death or everyone else’s.  Unlike Luke, who accepts his failures and faults, especially with Ben, and moves forward from the force like a Skype Obi-Wan Kenobi.  And, Rey, who accepts the past and can move towards the present, just the latest last Jedi.

You’re the first apologist I’ve read that hasn’t quoted “let the past die” as though it’s genuine wisdom.  I sincerely applaud you for that.

We all had a vision of what this film would be.  I know I did.  I was happy with the formula.  Disney could’ve been, too.  I’ve heard the cries about Snoke but what was Palpatine but a shadowy, influential figure named The Emperor by Return of the Jedi.

He was the despotic ruler of the Empire who Grand Moff Tarkin tells us swept away the final remnants of the Republic when he dissolved the Imperial Senate.  The novelization of Episode IV gave us the history of Palpatine in the first few pages.

Rey could’ve been the long-lost descendent of Darth Bane, hell, she still might be, we don’t know anything except the letdown of her origin lifted her to great heights.  And, we could’ve had the clash of titans, with red and blue lights whirring and cracking each time Luke and Kylo’s sabers met but we’ve seen that story seven times already.

Rian Johnson took all your tropes, set up your expectations and subverted all of them with stunning visuals and multiple twists that we’re all still trying to work out. He tore all our heroes down, stripped them, and made them question everything just as he asked the audience too. In some ways, we’ve got wonder if Rian Johnson is the last Jedi because he just played the greatest mind trick on us all.

Yeah, it’s all one big Jedi mind trick.  One that had us paying ridiculous admission ticket prices.

What Did People Learn From The Last Jedi Blu-Ray?

Germain Lussier at i09 writes a piece entitled, All the New Things We Learned From the Star Wars: The Last Jedi Blu-Ray.  In it, he describes some tidbits for those who are unwilling to buy the Blu-Ray themselves:

Before he even wrote the movie, writer-director Rian Johnson had these very specific ideas in his head: The idea of a casino planet where the one percent of the Star Wars universe lives.

SJW politics at its silliest.  Trump is a one percenter you see, because Trump owns casinos.  The truth is, one percenters tend to stay close to seats of government, where they can make deals and get kick backs and kiss the behinds of those in power.

It took the make-up team almost six months just to design Kylo Ren’s scar.

Six months to design a scar.  That explains a lot.

The hand that pulls the dice down from the Millennium Falcon mirror belongs to Rian Johnson. It’s his cameo.

A nice metaphor for how he’s taken down the franchise.

Creature designer Neal Scanlan said that The Last Jedi has more special effects work in it than The Force Awakens and Rogue One combined. Much of it ended up on the cutting room floor, but you can see some of it on the home release.

And far less screenwriting work than The Holiday Special.

In editing, Johnson almost cut out the lingering shot of the baby porgs in the Millennium Falcon many times. But every time she saw it, Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy laughed, so it stayed in.

Rian takes good direction from Kathleen Kennedy.  Clearly.

There was a lot of discussion of what Captain Phasma’s exposed eye would look like when Finn breaks her helmet. Johnson credits Daisy Ridley for telling him to just make it normal.

Daisy Ridley is so brilliant.  You wouldn’t want the eye to be damaged or scarred from the shrapnel of the helmet or anything.

While writing, Johnson considered having Luke use the Force for some massive attack at the end, but felt it went against his idea that the Force is not a superpower.

So instead he had Leia fly through space like Superman, with a superpower.

Despite many attempts to make them practical, from animatronics to dressing up dogs, Crait’s crystal foxes are all digital. Digitally, though, each one has 25,000 strands of CG hair coming off it.

Which means that Lucafilm was falsly touting the “practical” effects of the crystal foxes when they released this The Evolution of the Crystal Fox:

So apparently they’re making practical effects solely for marketing purposes now.

Johnson recorded his director’s commentary before the movie was released, so he never addresses some of the more “controversial issues.” However, even then he already had an idea they would be polarizing.

Not to worry.  There’s plenty on record from Rian Johnson’s Explanation Tour.

Rob Hunter writing at filmschoolrejects.com, tells us what we’ve learned from that director’s commentary.  Rob stupidly starts out with some ignorant snark:

As you undoubtedly know, Episode VIII in the ongoing Star Wars saga is one the highest-grossing films of all time and is universally loved by everyone whether they’ve seen it or not.


There’s definitely no irrational and childish backlash against its female-led heroics…

Well, no.  There’s not.  Rather, what there is a backlash against instead, is the moronic feminist and SJW politics in The Last Jedi.  Remember, feminist ideology and the female gender are no longer inextricably linked thanks to male progressives who now claim to be feminists.  Criticism of feminism no longer automatically translates into criticism of women.

…or interpretation of the film universe’s fictional psychic ability, the Force. Nope.

Even in a fantasy setting, there are a set of rules one must follow, a kind of physics you set up when world building.  Otherwise, why not have Mickey Mouse fight alongside Rey?  They’re both Disney properties in a fictional universe after all.  Unfortunately, uneducated morons such as Rian and this writer won’t really ever be able to understand this, which is why they produce inferior products like The Last Jedi.

In any case Rob, you may want to consult other experts in your field who contend that there isn’t any backlash at all.

I’m not sure what any of that had to do with the commentary on the Blu-Ray, but I suppose the idiot activist inside of him just had to get those virtue signals out so that he could feel better about himself.

In any case, here’s what he purportedly learns from the commentary:

The opening joke — General Hux’s (Domhnall Gleeson) issues during his call with Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) — was something Johnson insisted on keeping as he wanted the film to be fun despite the expected heaviness of being the trilogy’s second chapter. “It’s gonna be okay to laugh at this movie.”

Unless you laugh at it in the wrong way, in which case you’ll get accused of being part of an irrational and childish backlash.

He saw a lot of potential for humor in the character of Hux and admits to playing with him “in a slightly more comic way.”

“Ruthless” military officers are often humorous.  If only Grand Moff Tarkin had been more like Frank Burns.

The idea that Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) would toss the light saber away made sense to Johnson. It stems from him thinking about why Luke would be on this faraway island in the first place. “He knows his friends are fighting this good fight. He knows there’s peril out there in the galaxy, and he’s exiled himself way out here.” He knew the answer couldn’t be mere cowardice and instead would be something more positive.

I didn’t perceive any positivity in Jake Skywalker.

Regarding Leia Organa’s (Carrie Fisher) space walk Johnson recalls Kathleen Kennedy’s reminders that Leia is a Skywalker too. She has powers, presumably beyond just sensing the loss of a loved one, “and we never see them manifest.” He says she realizes at this moment that she has more work to do, “and almost through instinct, almost like you hear about parents when their kids are caught under cars being able to get Hulk strength and lift them up, that’s kind of what I wanted this moment to be.”

More direction from Kathleen Kennedy.  Great.

Vice Admiral Holdo (Laura Dern) was originally much more “hippie dippy,” but they readjusted her character in editing and with pick-up shots.

She’s still pretty dippy hippie.

He wanted to approach the idea of “the Force” by explaining that it’s not a super power. “It’s not like making things float, it’s not like an Iron Man-type superpower that you get, or Iron Man doesn’t have super powers, I know I know I know I know. Iron Man’s suit does everything.” So he gave a gentler, more spiritual explanation of it all, “a little bit of a reset on it.”

And as a result he turned the Force into gobbledygook, just as George Lucas feared.

They shot a “teachable moment” sequence where Luke mentally fabricates an attack on the island village for Rey to respond to and then get angry about, but they decided it was unnecessary. It’s available on the deleted scenes.

Of course it was unnecessary.  Yoda even tells us that as a Mary Sue she already knows everything contained in the sacred Jedi texts.  No training is necessary, and we certainly wouldn’t want to have Luke mansplain the Force to Rey anyway.

The commentary was recorded before the film opened, “so I haven’t heard what anyone actually thinks about this.”

Well, he certainly heard what Kathleen Kennedy thought about it.

DJ’s “true cynicism” regarding the galaxy’s arms dealers and how they supply both “sides” in the eternal war “felt dangerous” to bring into the Star Wars universe, but he felt it was important to the film and Finn’s journey.

For political purposes.

Regarding the tension between Poe and Holdo, he credits the Battlestar Galactica reboot (one of the top five shows ever IMO) with inspiring the idea that there can be discord between the good guys.

That concept existed long before 2004.  What the hell is he talking about?

Ridley and Driver did an immense amount of training for their big shared fight against the Praetorian guards, and their efforts paid off in that Johnson didn’t have to use long lenses or editing trickery to conceal their inadequacies or the faces of stunt performers. He was able to shoot wide and show the two of them actually doing the fights.

He knew he wanted walkers as they’re one of his favorite designs “in all of movie history,” and while they wanted to update it they didn’t want to change it too much. They eventually settled on the “gorilla walker” style to imply their greater strength.

Good thing he avoided derivatives.

Feminist Almost Sees Reality Through Her SJW Haze

Jewel Queen from The Mary Sue writes a piece entitled, The Inclusive Illusion of Star Wars: The Last Jedi.


If only feminists understood what reality looks like.

In it she writes,

While many critics and large numbers of fans have praised the film for its “new direction,” an undeniable backlash has grown against it. 

Undeniable?  We might think so.  But there’s plenty of people in the process of denying just such a thing.  Some folks are even openly calling for denial.  Read, here, here, here, and here.

Many fans of the movie have lumped all this criticism together as the same racist and misogynist fanboys who decried the inclusion of Finn from the first Force Awakens teaser…

Except that absolutely no one decried that.  It was a completely fabricated controversy.

…as well as the increase of women in Star Wars media.

This too is a completely fabricated controversy.  No one is decrying the increase of women in Star Wars media.  Rather, what some fans are decrying instead, is the injection of the pure idiocy of feminist ideology into Star Wars media.  That’s an important distinction to make.  I explain that in greater detail here.

Those hateful detractors certainly exist…

Actually, no, they don’t.

…but the limited perspective that all criticism is in that bad faith has masked the flaws of The Last Jedi in terms of feminism and diversity.

But that’s one of the primary problems we find in SJW psychopathology.  They instantly react to anything they dislike by calling it racist, sexist, misogynist, xenophobic, homophobic, etc. etc. etc.  They do this whether or not the word actually applies, and indeed, whether or not they actually have an understanding of the definition of the word they’re using.  It’s actually really interesting to study this particular behavioral aberration.

The movie diminishes the role of its own female lead, mishandles its characters of color, and gives women and POC no meaningful impact on the final story.

You’re one of the very few feminists who has been able to see this.  I’d highly recommend reading articles by Erin White from Afropunk, and Lelanie Seyffer at Hypable, to learn more about your forbidden point of view.

When The Force Awakens came out, Rey was a shining light for female fans of Star Wars. While Rey was not the first important woman in the franchise, she was significant in being one of the main protagonists like Luke and Anakin.

Well, that’s part of the feminist misunderstanding of Star Wars right there.  There was never a main protagonist.  The Star Wars films were ensemble pieces:

It was heartwarming to see Rey have agency andhumanity. However, The Last Jedi strips these elements from her. Rather than the focus of Rey’s arc being on her Jedi training and character development, Rey is relegated to attempting to make Luke Skywalker return to the Resistance and trying to “save” Kylo Ren, even if he shows no signs of remorse.

It’s amazing how nonsensical and ridiculous things that can be contrived in a screenplay, isn’t it?

The issue here is that the story focuses more on how Luke feels about his past failures, and Kylo’s “reasons” for turning against Luke. It does not give any consideration to Rey’s emotions and choices, and even when it does, it is very weak.

Do we really need to learn about Rey’s emotions in a war movie?

In our current times, it’s disturbing how our female lead is expected to excuse a threatening and violent white man just because of his tragic backstory.

It is?  How many times has a female lead excused a threatening and violent white man just because of his tragic backstory?  I mean, specifically.  What specific instances are you referring to.  I’m asking, because I know that you composed that sentence thinking that it sounded wise, while not having any idea as to whether or not it represents an accurate reflection of factual reality.

The situation worsens as Rey goes on a suicide mission to save “Ben Solo.” Rey speaks of how she saw a vision of Kylo’s future in the Light Side, but we are simply told instead of shown. Even in the throne room sequence, Rey’s decisions are not at the center, as the big twist is Kylo choosing to kill his master, Supreme Leader Snoke.

Feminists always have to be at the center of everything.

Rey’s screen time even dropped from 43 minutes in TFA to 30 minutes in TLJ. She didn’t go on a compelling journey that expanded her character in any genuine way.

That’s because Rey’s not a compelling character that can be expanded upon in any genuine way.

In the first space battle, I was thrilled to meet Paige Tico, a Vietnamese female space pilot, only to get crushed after seeing her die without so much as one line of dialogue.

Fighter pilots do sometimes die in battle.

The damage grew worse with Finn’s treatment. Despite getting an injury so painful it put him in a coma, Finn wakes up, bangs his head, and walks around in nothing but a bacta suit on in his first scene, all for comedic relief. He’s demoted from a protagonist to side-character throughout his seventeen minutes of reduced screen time.

And those who haven’t let the past die, know when this sort of thing has been done before.

Rose is denied proper writing, as most of her time is spent preaching to Finn about how things like child slavery are bad—to a former child-soldier.

Don’t you understand?  She has to fem-splain things to Finn.

This has caused many fans to hate Rose, but imagine what could have been if she had been well written!

How are the SJW activists working in the Lucasfilm Story Group going to accomplish that exactly?

She’s also given a flat romance with Finn, after she sacrifices himself to save him to show how we must save what we love, which … he wasn’t already doing all along?

I don’t think anyone understands what they were doing all along.

Part of diversity is actively putting your characters of color in impactful roles and allowing them to live as most white leads do. 

You mean like Lando Calrissian, from 38 years ago?

Poe Dameron is also changed from the responsible and caring person he was in The Force Awakens to a reckless, disobedient, and glory-obsessed pilot. 

It’s what needed to happen, so that Holdo could teach him a deeply stupid feminist lesson.

Poe is forced to deal with his new leader, Admiral Holdo, who he has a right to question, as she denies any of the Resistance information about her plan.

You’re starting to think like a normal person.

Finally, The Last Jedi does not give the female characters and characters of color any other role than supporting their (white) male counterparts. 

It kind of makes you wonder why so many feminists think this film passes the worthless Bechdel Test, doesn’t it?

Rey’s job is to sway Luke, then Kylo, to her side. Rose has the job of teaching Finn something he already knew. Holdo exists to make Poe listen to women. And what about Leia Organa, who only hours ago lost her husband and, by the film’s conclusion, her brother? Leia is put in a coma after her Shooting Stars sequence, and no insight is given into how she feels, nor does she get to make meaningful decisions.

Well, the women in charge made the decision not to gas up before they left, which led to two days worth of failed missions and all but a dozen or so Resistance soldiers to their deaths.  I’d say that might be meaningful.

Like diversity, feminism is more than just having women on the screen.

But this was feminism on screen.  That’s precisely why it was so incredibly stupid.

Admiral Holdo is killed off to complete Poe’s character arc. It’s quite telling how one of the most memorable shots of the film is a woman sacrificing herself after she’s outlived her usefulness to the story.

When did Holdo have any usefulness?

Rose is left in a state of limbo at the film’s conclusion, and it’s implied that there might be a competition between her and Rey for Finn’s attention, because how feminist is it to have two women fighting over a man, right?

Actually, folks are thinking that Rose is going to get Jar-Jared and dropped from the narrative almost entirely.  But really, who cares either way?

The end product leaves all the female characters and characters of color without any meaningful impact on the story. 

This is probably news to Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy, who worked so hard to bring you their diversity fashion show.

This is disheartening because two years ago, Lucasfilm promised that everyone would be a part of Star Wars with the Sequel Trilogy. 

You can see what would happen if everyone was a part of Star Wars here.  Seriously though, Star Wars could never properly be about everyone.  Because everyone doesn’t fight in wars.  And that’s what Star Wars is about; war.  Hence the “wars” in Star Wars.

Fans who disliked this movie ought to be taken seriously, not lumped in the same boat as the men who call Rey a Mary Sue.

But the men who called Rey a Mary Sue had a legitimate point too.

If people do not listen to these concerns, Lucasfilm may repeat these mistakes with Episode 9.

They’re going to repeat many mistakes, because Lucsfilm no longer employs wise storytellers.  Rather, they employ naive political activists instead.

The fans need to rise up this time to give Rey, Finn, Poe, Rose, Leia, Holdo, and more the story they deserve.

I’m willing to bet that most fans don’t give a hoot about Rey, Finn, Poe, Rose or Holdo.  But only the box office for Episode IX will tell us for sure.

Explaining Things To Star Wars Explained

A short time ago, Alex Damon of Star Wars Explained released a video criticizing the public reaction to the blaster-less Han Solo posters.

In it, Alex states:

“…everyone is acting like Disney and Lucasfilm are trying to take the wars out of Star Wars.”

In all fairness, why wouldn’t some people react this way?  Let’s go over some of the past, before we let it die.

In the The Last Jedi, the audience was treated to a lecture from Rose Tico, about the weapons trade, and how evil it is.  So it’s clear that the writers of the film are now using the Star Wars franchise as a vehicle to push an anti-gun agenda.

That lecture gives new light to The Force Awakens, in which the protagonist Rey fights off armed assailants through half the film with a stick.  The writing of this perplexing scenario now makes much more sense in the context of the writer’s anti-gun activism.

Additionally, we can look to the overseer of Disney-era Star Wars, Kathleen Kennedy, and the history of her heavy involvement in films.  For instance, Kathleen Kennedy was a producer on the 20th Anniversary E.T. The Extraterrestial DVD.  In that updated film, the handguns held by police officers were digitally replaced with walkie-talkies.

Fast forward to 2008 and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal SkullRed Letter Media does an interesting analysis on that franchise, comparing the number of people that Indy kills in each film:

In short, while Indiana Jones kills multiple enemies in the original three films, he only kills one person in Crystal Skull; the Indiana Jones film that Kathleen Kennedy worked on as producer.

Given this historical track record, along with the now widely known SJW agenda driven material throughout the Disney-era Star Wars franchise, it was perfectly reasonable for many to suspect that “Disney and Lucasfilm were trying to take the wars out of Star Wars.”  In fact, I’m not entirely convinced that the current writing staff at Lucasfilm (or indeed many in the fanbase) are at all aware that the word “wars” appears in the title of the franchise, as I’ve written about many times here.

Alex continues:

“What nobody was talking about or mentioning was the fact that these were international posters.”

In fact, I was talking about and mentioning the fact that these were international posters.  I wrote in my original post:

Collider reported in a March 15th article, that the blaster-less posters are the international posters, which goes back to my previous update.  In an article entitled, ‘Solo: A Star Wars Story’ International Posters Get Some Noteworthy Changes.  Allison Keene writes:

In the posters below, you’ll notice that the big block lettering has been removed, and replaced with a more standard logo for the movie. And instead of being identified as “Solo,” Han is now just Han. Those are fairly minor changes, and not surprising given the potential lawsuit, but there’s another noteworthy adjustment — no guns. If you’re wondering why Han looks so weird it’s because his arm was moved down and his gun taken away, resulting in a very odd pose. Qi’ra and Lando come out looking fine, though Chewie now looks like he’s having a class photo taken

Some apologists are defending these posters, by saying that they’re for international markets.  According to them, European and other international markets can not show people holding guns whether real or imaginary on movie posters.

This changes nothing, because the motivation for doing this remains the same.

The international markets that don’t allow depictions of people holding guns on movie posters, are dictated by governments which are run by people who have the very same SJW mentality.  In essence, Lucasfilm is appeasing foreign SJW bureaucrats.

Alex continues:

“Not only that, but the posters being compared are from two completely different countries.”

So what?  Whether or not the two posters in question are from two completely different countries or not, means less than nothing.  The political motivation for removing the weapons in the Brazilian posters, is the exact same political motivation that wrote Rose Tico’s anti-gun lecture in The Last Jedi.  More on that later.

Alex continues:

“So, no poster was ever changed.  The quote unquote original poster is in Spanish, and the supposedly changed poster is in Portuguese.”  

The fact that one poster was in Spanish while the other was in Portuguese doesn’t serve as any kind of evidence that the posters weren’t changed, so I’m not sure why Alex would make that point.  Of course they were changed.  One had weapons, one didn’t.  Alex contends that they changed the posters to suit different markets, but the reality is that they changed the posters to suit political agendas.  More on that later.  But the reasons for the change, doesn’t erase the fact that it is still a change.  If I’m sitting at Photoshop, and I have a picture of Han Solo pointing a gun in a PSD file, I have to change something to get his arm to hang down without a blaster in his hand.  That’s a change.

Alex continues:

“So rest assured, this change [air quotes] has nothing to do with gun violence in the United States.  It might have something to do with gun violence in Brazil, I just don’t know.”

I do know.  Sometime around March 24th or 25th, I emailed Alex a link to this follow up post.  In it I discuss a purported response from Disney on this matter:

Stephen M. Colbert from ScreenRant states that the blaster-less posters are specifically for Brazil:

First of all, the posters arent for the United States. They’re posters for Brazil. Brazil has had its own recent national debate over firearms, but that’s not even the reason their posters look different. Screen Rant has spoken with Disney about the posters in question and they’ve verified that the posters are specific to Brazil, and they are likely that way because Brazil is trying to push a more family-friendly image for Solo (or “Han Solo” as it’s marketed there) in that region. The posters aren’t distributed in the US, and the change has nothing to do with the gun issues in the US.

That’s really quite interesting, if that’s what Disney is claiming.  Because according to an article entitled, People Are Ready to Buy Some Guns in the World’s Murder Capital, written on March 20th 2018 by David Biller at Bloomberg:

Desperate Brazilians are wondering whether they’d be better off armed, given that around 60,000 of their compatriots are killed each year. Polls show support for gun ownership gaining ground. In an election year, politicians are paying attention.

“Everyday, everywhere you look, the criminal is armed with a high-powered weapon as the citizen tries to hide,” Rogerio Peninha Mendonca, the lawmaker behind the proposal, said in an interview. “What we want is for the citizen to be more capable of defending himself.”

The idea runs counter to recent calls in the U.S. for greater gun control, as well as the global trend towards restricting access to firearms that’s seen Australia, the U.K, Canada, New Zealand and Germany tighten their laws in recent decades.

Forty-two percent of Brazilians believe gun ownership is a citizen’s right, according to a November survey by pollster Datafolha. That’s up from 30 percent four years earlier. And of the lower house lawmakers who have expressed opinions publicly, slightly more than half support the proposed legislation, according to a scoreboard maintained by Peninha’s staff.

Stephen M. Colbert at ScreenRant continues:

Second, the “changes” to the posters aren’t actually changing anything. The controversy is mostly based on the comparison of two sets of posters (example above) that appear identical other than the fact that one set features the characters with guns and the other doesn’t. Not only were these posters released at about the same time, but the posters in question are the first Solo posters for Brazil, meaning it’s impossible for them to have been “changed” as there were no previous Brazillian posters to change from. The only reason people think they were changed is because they’re comparing them to the Spanish posters, where the characters all still have blasters. The casual eye may not be able to differentiate between Spanish and Portuguese, but it’s clear they’re different languages as one movie is titled Han Solo: Una Historia de Star Wars and the other is Han Solo: Uma História de Star Wars. Other words are also different, such as the Spanish “cines” and the Portuguese “cinemas.”

Nonsense.  If the posters really were specifically for Brazil, then they were changed (or customized if you prefer that word) to appease like-minded SJW bureaucrats in Brazil who oppose loosening their guns laws in the midst of a contentious public debate.  The last thing they want to do, is give their political opposition potential inspiration through a movie like Solo.

It’s worth noting that Stephen M. Colbert doesn’t really supply any direct quotes or official statements from Disney, only claiming that they’ve “spoken with Disney.”

So in fact, the posters were changed to appease the same “liberal agenda” in the firearms debate in Brazil.  Disney’s purported statement is questionable given the political realities of the situation.  It’s possible that my email to Star Wars Explained fell into his spam folder, but I haven’t seen any corrections or updates on this matter from Star Wars Explained since.

Alex continued:

“But even if these were American posters, I would have the same reaction, and that would be; who cares?  It’s not like they’re going to go through, and remove all of the blasters from Solo digitally.”

Why not?  They removed the guns in E.T. The Extraterrestrial.  And 80% of the Solo film was reshot.  That leaves significant room for such changes, digitally or otherwise.

Additionally, Gareth Edwards has stated that Lucasfilm ordered extensive reshoots of his version of Rogue Onebecause they were unhappy with the darker grittier wartime documentary style of the film.  So making such changes would fall within the known spectrum of Lucafilm’s actions, if Gareth’s account is to be believed.

Alex continued:

“To steal a joke from Wookiepedia left on my Twitter about this topic, yeah, Star Wars is rebranding itself into Star Peace.  It’s absurd to make that kind of assumption based on international posters, and marketing that you clearly did not take even a second to fully research or comprehend before you cranked out a video on it.”

How about making that assumption based on the statements made by Laura Dern:

“In their minds, and in their understanding of the origin story, we know that she was a true rebel in the Resistance, and in our culture we might have called her a hippie,” Dern tells EW. “But she was longing for peace, and a revolutionary in that way, and wanted to be trained by and led by Leia, who taught her everything she knew. She wanted to come up in the ranks to support Leia’s mission, but also had this otherworldly side that does involve the Force.”

“Yeah, her primary goal was to protect the light, to protect the Force, and to keep the revolutionaries alive,” Dern tells EW. “And I think the film speaks so beautifully to that with this last image of the next generation of the Resistance, you know?”

And there was also this:

“Holdo’s homeworld, Gatalenta, is essentially a planet of space hippies, studying astrology, meditating and valuing serenity above all things.”

So how absurd is it to consider the possibility, that a franchise which creates a hippie peacenik character as a commanding vice admiral, might rebrand itself as Star Peace?  After all, this new character values serenity above all things.

At one point in Alex’s video, he calls out another YouTuber for admitting that “he doesn’t know.”  Yet Alex himself in his own video admits that he just doesn’t know if the posters have anything to do with gun violence in Brazil.  He admonishes the other YouTuber for reacting on incomplete information, yet Alex is doing much the same in his own video without any knowledge of the political debate over guns raging in Brazil, or of the larger political agendas which cross national boundaries in our global 21st Century world.  All one had to do was watch the recent Oscars to understand that the people in this industry are politically motivated in absolutely everything they do.

If you’re going to take it upon yourself as a self-appointed authority figure to lecture others about reactionary behavior, then it would behoove you to do your own research into matters outside of Star Wars.  The world is a big place, and many things influence the actions of movie studios and the actions of the individuals running them; politics in particular. Failing to do this could likewise be considered irresponsible.

Alex hopes the other YouTuber learns a lesson from all of this.  How magnanimous of him.  But frankly the other YouTuber did nothing wrong in my opinion.  He reacted to information that was given to him in an honest manner.  He cautioned his viewers that the article may or may not be legit.  He allowed for the possibility that he could be wrong on this.  There’s nothing irresponsible about that whatsoever.  In fact, offering those warnings was very responsible.  He didn’t pass himself off as some know-it-all with confirmed concrete information.  And many folks turn to crowds of people for research.  It’s called crowdsourcing.  Thousands of eyes can find more than just two.  So I’m not sure what lesson he has to learn here, or indeed that Alex has any lesson to teach him.  In fact it’s the other YouTuber’s raw honesty that makes his videos far more compelling to watch than listening to the recitations of well-rehearsed propagandists.

But at the end of the day, hopefully Alex learns a much needed lesson of his own here.  And that lesson is that Alex has the exact same stinky brown hole as every other human being on the planet.  Remember, self-appointed know-it-all authority and massive stupidity always walks hand in hand.  Because a truly thinking person understands that no one on Earth knows it all.  Not anyone.


And after all of that, the United States character posters end up having the same blasterless images as Jeremy from Geeks + Gamers pointed out:


Interestingly, the international Brazilian market that the blasterless posters were supposed to appeal to, performed the worst out of the Top 10 box office territories, according to the-numbers.com:


While the box office territory that performed best, had blasters in their posters, which can be read about here.


The Nightmare Will Never End

Thought you might just wait it out till after Episode IX, hoping that maybe someone would replace Kathleen Kennedy and return the franchise to form after the silly Sequel Trilogy?

Oh, you poor fool.

Back on November 3rd, 2017, Gael Fashingbauer Cooper of C-Net wrote an article entitled, Star Wars won’t end with Episode IX: More stories coming.

In it, she reports on a statement from Kathleen Kennedy:

Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy told “The Star Wars Show” that plans are already being made to keep the saga’s galaxy busy for years to come.

“We’re talking about the next 10 years of Star Wars stories, and we’re looking at, narratively, where that might go,” Kennedy said. “Future stories beyond ‘Episode IX’ with these new characters: Rey, Poe, Finn, BB-8 — but we’re also looking at working with people who are interested in coming into the Star Wars world and taking us to places we haven’t been yet.”

Kennedy also praised “Last Jedi” director Rian Johnson. “He’s such a huge fan,” she said, “and I think he’s doing an exceptional job of taking these new characters and some of the legacy characters and moving us to this next place.”

Do you know what this means?

This means that potentially, Rey, Poe, Finn, and BB-8 will be the faces of the Star Wars franchise for the next decade or more.



Maybe Kathleen Kennedy will be Force sensitive in her own special trilogy.